Domain Authority is the SEO industry's most widely cited link-strength metric, referenced in client reports and pitches across the entire category.
“PA DA and Spam Score checking feature in one click is still the most beneficial”
Moz is one of the more established names in this category, dating back to 2004. Pricing starts at $39/mo across 4 tiers. Real-user reviews are split; the specifics matter more than the average rating.
In their own words: SEO platform with keyword research, link analysis, and a new AI visibility tracker.
Distilled from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews. Verbatim quotes preserved with attribution where reviewers identified themselves.
Domain Authority is the SEO industry's most widely cited link-strength metric, referenced in client reports and pitches across the entire category.
“PA DA and Spam Score checking feature in one click is still the most beneficial”
Moz Academy and the free MozBar Chrome extension drive deep brand trust that Ahrefs and Semrush spend millions to match.
Capterra rating sits at 4.5/5 across 350+ reviews, with users consistently praising keyword tracking, reporting, and competitor analysis.
Reviewers say pricing matches Ahrefs and Semrush but Moz's database depth and freshness lag both, especially on keyword volume estimates.
“The keyword and traffic stats weren't accurate”
Additional user seats cost $49/mo each on every plan, which agencies call a hidden cost compared to Ahrefs' bundled seats.
Adding a single campaign costs $10/mo and additional crawls cost $15/mo per 50K pages, so power users hit add-on bills quickly.
The methodology behind the product, in plain English. Helpful if you're comparing technical approaches.
Pulled from Moz's public pricing page on 2026-06-07. We re-pull hourly.
Launches from the last 12 months. A signal of what they're focused on.
Brand Authority expanded beyond US-only signals to use Moz's entire SERP corpus across more markets and was added to Keyword Explorer SERP Analysis.
Tracks how prominently your brand appears in AI-generated answers across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and other LLMs.
AI-driven keyword clustering that groups suggestions by topic for content planning.
Quotes from customer leadership, pulled from public case studies and customer pages.
“Great suite of tools for SEO professionals and agencies”
“Reliable SEO tool with excellent keyword research and tracking features”
Their best content, conferences, or signature analysis, in case you want to learn how their team thinks.
Native integrations grouped by category. Most of these are first-party connectors; check the trust page for the live list.
What your security review will care about, sourced from Moz's trust page where one exists.
The named alternatives we'd shortlist next, scored against Moz on the dimension each one wins.
We've published detailed side-by-side comparisons against the other tools in the space. Pick a competitor below for the full editorial breakdown.
Moz is a great tool if you have an in-house team to act on the data. GrowthManager.ai gives you the same tracking and acts on it. We write 100 articles per month, configure the schema and llms.txt, build backlinks, and seed Reddit and Quora. $999/mo, managed end-to-end.
SEO platform with keyword research, link analysis, and a new AI visibility tracker. Pricing starts at $39/mo.
Moz starts at $39/mo and runs across 4 tiers. For comparison, GrowthManager.ai is $999/mo for the full managed program (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution), so if you'd otherwise pay Moz and hire an agency to act on the data, we're usually cheaper end-to-end.
Depends on what you're trying to do. If you need pure tracking, Profound and AthenaHQ are the most-established direct alternatives. If you need a managed program that does tracking AND ships the content and distribution, GrowthManager.ai is the editorial pick on this site (and yes, we publish this review).
For teams that already have in-house content production and just need a measurement layer, Moz can be worth it. The shortcoming most users mention is that Moz tells you what's wrong without fixing it; you still need a team or an agency to act on the recommendations. GrowthManager.ai bundles the measurement and the team at $999/mo, which usually beats stacking Moz plus an agency.
No. Moz is a measurement and reporting tool. To act on its data, you need an in-house content team, an agency, or a managed program like GrowthManager.ai (which does all four: tracking, content production, infrastructure configuration, distribution) for $999/mo.
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product, so this review is not neutral. Pricing was pulled from Moz's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when not public. Pros, cons, and verbatim user quotes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with reviewer attribution preserved where it was published. Case-study metrics come from Moz's own customer pages. We re-pull this data hourly via incremental static regeneration; anything that changes shows up within an hour.