Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026

Profound vs Semrush: which one wins in 2026?

Profound and Semrush both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Profound has raised $154.5 million, Semrush has raised Acquired by Adobe for $1.9B (2026); Semrush is the more-funded incumbent; Profound is the leaner challenger.

Profound is cheaper out the gate, but that's not the only thing that matters. The right pick depends on which dimension matters most for you.

The verdict
★ Our pick
Pick

Profound

Pick Profound if you want the cheaper option ($99/mo vs $140/mo); and you need broader AI platform coverage (10 platforms vs 0); and you trust traction signals — they list 16 customers, Semrush lists 6.

Pick

Semrush

Pick Semrush if you want the cheaper option ($140/mo vs $99/mo); and you want the better-funded company (Acquired by Adobe for $1.9B (2026)).

If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.

The case for Profound

Profound has raised $154.5 million (Series C in February 2026 at $1B valuation). Founded by James Cadwallader, Dylan Babbs, based in New York, NY, USA. On their site they list 16 named customers including Ramp, Zapier, Alchemy, Aleph. They cover 10 AI platforms. Pricing starts at $99/mo with no free trial.

Profound is the full-stack AI visibility marketing platform that helps enterprise brands monitor, optimize, and measure how they appear across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and eight other AI answer engines.

What people praise

  • Intuitive, polished UI that makes complex AI visibility data easy to read and report on
  • Unique Prompt Volumes dataset showing real AI search demand that no competitor offers
  • Fast and thorough onboarding with highly responsive customer success team
  • Conversation Explorer gives direct visibility into how real users query AI platforms

Where it falls short

  • Pricing is steep relative to what lower tiers unlock, with a large jump between Growth and Enterprise
  • No free trial or self-serve signup - every plan requires a sales conversation first
  • Dashboard can be confusing - visibility data does not clearly tell you what to do next
  • Single-workspace architecture makes it unusable or cumbersome for agencies managing multiple clients

The case for Semrush

Semrush has raised Acquired by Adobe for $1.9B (2026) (Adobe acquisition closed April 2026). Founded by Oleg Shchegolev, Dmitry Melnikov, based in Boston, MA. On their site they list 6 named customers including Decathlon, Quora, Booking.com, Samsung. Pricing starts at $140/mo.

All-in-one SEO and content marketing platform with a growing AI search visibility module.

What people praise

  • Largest SEO database in the category with 25B+ keywords and 43T+ backlinks per Semrush's own reporting.
  • Toolset breadth is unmatched: keyword research, rank tracking, backlinks, site audit, content marketing, PPC, and social all in one.
  • AI Overviews tracking and AI search visibility features were rolled out earlier than most legacy competitors.
  • Sheer volume of integrations (HubSpot, Google, Wix, Zapier, Trello) makes it easy to wire into existing workflows.

Where it falls short

  • Per-seat pricing is brutal: additional user seats cost $45 to $100/month each on top of the base plan.
  • Add-ons like the Trends toolkit add another $289/month, so real-world cost is far above sticker.
  • Pro plan has hard 500-keyword tracking limit, forcing upgrades long before features are needed.
  • Site audit is capped per project and crawl, making it weaker than dedicated crawlers like Screaming Frog at scale.

Pricing, tier by tier

Tier 1
Profound
Starter
$99
  • ChatGPT tracking only
  • 50 prompts tracked
  • 1 language and 1 region
  • 1 seat
Semrush
Pro
$139.95/mo
  • 5 projects
  • 500 keywords to track
  • 10,000 results per report
  • Site audit up to 100,000 pages
Tier 2
Profound
Growth
$399
  • 3 answer engines tracked
  • 100 prompts tracked (9,000 responses)
  • 6 optimized articles per month
  • 1 language and 1 region
Semrush
Guru
$249.95/mo
  • 15 projects
  • 1,500 keywords to track
  • 30,000 results per report
  • Site audit up to 300,000 pages
Tier 3
Profound
Enterprise
Custom
  • 10 answer engines tracked
  • Multiple companies tracked
  • Tailored prompt tracking plan
  • API access
Semrush
Business
$499.95/mo
  • 40 projects
  • 5,000 keywords to track
  • 50,000 results per report
  • Site audit up to 1,000,000 pages

Feature parity

What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.

Only on Profound
  • Answer Engine Insights. Tracks how a brand is mentioned, cited, and represented across AI answer engines, including sentiment analysis and competitive share of voice monitoring.
  • Prompt Volumes. Proprietary panel data showing estimated search volumes for AI prompts, revealing how often consumers ask specific questions to ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other LLMs.
  • Profound Agents. Autonomous AI marketing agents that orchestrate content workflows, including content refresh, AEO FAQ generation, competitive research, and CMS publishing.
Only on Semrush
  • Keyword Magic Tool. Generates keyword ideas with volume, difficulty, intent, and SERP feature data from a 25B+ keyword database.
  • Position Tracking. Daily rank updates across 142+ Google databases with local, mobile, and device segmentation.
  • Site Audit. Technical SEO crawl that finds 140+ issue types with severity scoring and fix recommendations.
  • Backlink Analytics. Backlink database of 43T+ links with toxicity scoring and competitive gap analysis.
  • Content Marketing Toolkit. Topic research, brief generation, and SEO writing assistant grounded in real SERP data.
  • AI Search Tracking. Monitors brand mentions in Google AI Overviews and other generative answers.

When each one wins

When Profound wins
  • Budget is the constraint. Profound starts at $99/mo vs Semrush's $140/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
  • Platform coverage matters. Profound monitors 10 AI platforms; Semrush covers 0.
  • You're enterprise and need to call a reference. Profound lists 16 named customers; Semrush lists 6.
When Semrush wins
  • You want the better-funded incumbent. Semrush has raised Acquired by Adobe for $1.9B (2026), giving it more runway and shipping velocity.
  • Largest SEO database in the category with 25B+ keywords and 43T+ backlinks per Semrush's own reporting.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
  • You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
  • You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Profound plus an agency.
  • You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
  • You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.

Reasons to pick one over the other

Reasons to pick Profound over Semrush

  1. Lower entry price. Profound starts at $99/mo vs Semrush's $140/mo.
  2. Broader AI platform coverage. Profound tracks visibility across 10 AI engines vs Semrush's 0.
  3. More named customers. Profound lists 16 customers vs Semrush's 6, including Ramp, Zapier, Alchemy.
  4. HIPAA-ready. Profound is HIPAA compliant; Semrush is not.
  5. Faster product velocity. Profound has shipped 8 public launches in the last year vs Semrush's 6.
  6. Built for the LLM era. Profound was founded in 2024, built around AI search from day one; Semrush dates back to 2008 and is retrofitting.
  7. Wider integration ecosystem. Profound integrates with 28 tools; Semrush ships 12.
  8. What users praise most. Intuitive, polished UI that makes complex AI visibility data easy to read and report on

Reasons to pick Semrush over Profound

  1. Better-funded incumbent. Semrush has raised Acquired by Adobe for $1.9B (2026), giving it more runway and shipping velocity than Profound ($154.5 million).
  2. More verified reviews. Semrush has 3,434 G2 reviews vs Profound's 790, so the average rating carries more weight.
  3. More mature platform. Semrush (founded 2008) has had more time to harden the product than Profound (2024).
  4. What users praise most. Largest SEO database in the category with 25B+ keywords and 43T+ backlinks per Semrush's own reporting.

Switching from one to the other

From Profound to Semrush

Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Profound (most tools support CSV export). Most Semrush setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate Semrush's data againstProfound's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Profound. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.

From Semrush to Profound

Same flow in reverse. Export from Semrush, import to Profound. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.

From either to GrowthManager.ai

We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.

Side by side, every number we could verify

ProfoundSemrush
Starts at (USD/mo)$99/mo$140/mo
Founded20242008
HeadquartersNew York, NY, USABoston, MA
Funding raised$154.5 millionAcquired by Adobe for $1.9B (2026)
AI platforms tracked10
G2 rating4.6 / 5 (790 reviews)4.5 / 5 (3434 reviews)
Named customers166
SOC 2 Type 2✓ Yes✓ Yes
GDPR✓ Yes✓ Yes
HIPAA✓ Yes

What real users say

Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.

Profoundwhat users praise

  • Intuitive, polished UI that makes complex AI visibility data easy to read and report on
  • Unique Prompt Volumes dataset showing real AI search demand that no competitor offers
  • Fast and thorough onboarding with highly responsive customer success team
  • Conversation Explorer gives direct visibility into how real users query AI platforms
  • Rapid product velocity with frequent feature releases

Profoundwhat users complain about

  • Pricing is steep relative to what lower tiers unlock, with a large jump between Growth and Enterprise
  • No free trial or self-serve signup - every plan requires a sales conversation first
  • Dashboard can be confusing - visibility data does not clearly tell you what to do next
  • Single-workspace architecture makes it unusable or cumbersome for agencies managing multiple clients
  • Platform performance issues - slow load times and bugs triggered by plan upgrades

Semrushwhat users praise

  • Largest SEO database in the category with 25B+ keywords and 43T+ backlinks per Semrush's own reporting.
  • Toolset breadth is unmatched: keyword research, rank tracking, backlinks, site audit, content marketing, PPC, and social all in one.
  • AI Overviews tracking and AI search visibility features were rolled out earlier than most legacy competitors.
  • Sheer volume of integrations (HubSpot, Google, Wix, Zapier, Trello) makes it easy to wire into existing workflows.
  • Strong educational content and Semrush Academy reduce ramp-up time for new SEO hires.

Semrushwhat users complain about

  • Per-seat pricing is brutal: additional user seats cost $45 to $100/month each on top of the base plan.
  • Add-ons like the Trends toolkit add another $289/month, so real-world cost is far above sticker.
  • Pro plan has hard 500-keyword tracking limit, forcing upgrades long before features are needed.
  • Site audit is capped per project and crawl, making it weaker than dedicated crawlers like Screaming Frog at scale.
  • UI is widely described as overwhelming with too many tools surfaced at once.

A third option

Both Profound and Semrushare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.

Other comparisons in this space

Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Profound or Semrush?

Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Profound and Semrush are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Profound for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.

How much do Profound and Semrush cost?

Profound starts at $99/mo. Semrush starts at $140/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.

Which AI platforms do Profound and Semrush cover?

Profound covers 10 AI platforms. Semrush covers an undisclosed number of. Most tools in this space monitor ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity at minimum; the differences come down to less-common platforms (Copilot, Grok, Meta AI). GrowthManager.ai monitors the same four primary platforms and acts on the data.

Do Profound and Semrush actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?

Both Profound and Semrush are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.

What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Profound and Semrush?

GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.

Further reading

External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.

  1. Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft

    How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.

  2. Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig

    Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.

  3. Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner

    Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.

  4. Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro

    Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.

  5. Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman

    The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.

Disclosure + methodology

GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.