Pick
AthenaHQ
Pick AthenaHQ if you want the cheaper option ($295/mo vs $0/mo); and you need broader AI platform coverage (8 platforms vs 0).
Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026
AthenaHQ vs Linkup: which one wins in 2026?
AthenaHQ and Linkup both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. AthenaHQ has raised $2.7M, Linkup has raised $13.2M; Linkup is the more-funded incumbent; AthenaHQ is the leaner challenger.
Linkup is cheaper out the gate, but AthenaHQ tracks more AI platforms. The right pick depends on which dimension matters most for you.
The verdict
Pick
Linkup
Pick Linkup if you want the cheaper option ($0/mo vs $295/mo); and you want the better-funded company ($13.2M).
If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.
The case for AthenaHQ
AthenaHQ has raised $2.7M (Seed — $2.2M (June 2025)). Founded by Andrew Yan, Alan Yao, based in San Francisco, CA. On their site they list 9 named customers including Rootly, Lago, Gruns, Popl. They cover 8 AI platforms. Pricing starts at $295/mo with no free trial.
AthenaHQ is a GEO/AEO platform that tracks and optimizes brand visibility inside AI-generated search answers across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and five other LLMs.
What people praise
- Actionable, prioritized recommendations via the Action Center -- not just dashboards
- Granular, multi-engine visibility tracking that surfaces insights no prior tool could provide
- Measurable, documented lift in AI visibility and pipeline attribution
- Intuitive interface with a fast setup that non-technical users can adopt quickly
Where it falls short
- Credit-based pricing is opaque and causes surprise overages for active users
- Premium pricing ($295/mo+) excludes smaller businesses and agencies with budget-constrained clients
- Key features (ACE Citation Engine, Prompt Volume data, API) are locked behind Enterprise tier
- Sentiment and competitive benchmarking analytics are too shallow to be fully actionable
The case for Linkup
Linkup has raised $13.2M ($10M Seed (Feb 2026, led by Gradient)). Founded by Philippe Mizrahi, Denis Charrier, Boris Toledano, based in Paris, France. On their site they list 8 named customers including McKinsey & Company, Cohere, KPMG, EY. Pricing starts at $0/mo.
Search API used by AI agents — the data layer for retrieval-augmented LLM apps.
What people praise
- Built specifically as an API for AI agents and LLMs, not retrofitted from a consumer search product
- Licenses content from publishers and pays them on usage, so results are legal and citation-safe
- Sub-second search latency is fast enough for real-time agent tool calls
- Free tier ships 4,000 queries and startups can apply for $5,000 in credits
Where it falls short
- Per-request pricing makes monthly cost hard to forecast for high-volume agents
- Deep Research mode can cost up to $2.50 per call, expensive at scale
- Not a visibility, SEO or content product, it is a raw search API and you build the workflow yourself
- No G2 or Capterra reviews yet, the company only launched its API in late 2024
Pricing, tier by tier
Tier 1
AthenaHQ
Self-Serve
$295/mo
- Coverage across 8 LLMs (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok)
- On/off-page GEO analysis
- Competitor monitoring
- Citation intelligence
Linkup
Fetch
$0.001 - $0.005 per request
- URL content extraction
- Sub-2 second latency, synchronous
- 4,000 complimentary queries for new accounts
Tier 2
AthenaHQ
Enterprise
Custom
- All Self-Serve features
- LLM traffic analysis
- Self-improving content workflows
- Content Optimization AI Agent with Deep Research
Linkup
Search
$0.005 - $0.006 per request
- Web search tool calls for AI agents
- Fast, Standard and Deep variants
- 1-3 second synchronous latency
- Sourced, cited answers with full-text snippets
Tier 3
AthenaHQ
—
—
Linkup
Research
$0.25 - $2.50 per request
- Asynchronous deep research over the web
- 1-10 minute latency
- Multi-step reasoning with citations
Tier 4
AthenaHQ
—
—
Linkup
Enterprise
Custom
- Personalized indexes
- Dedicated index refresh rates
- Private environments and bring-your-own-cloud
- IP whitelisting, ZDR, SOC 2 Type II, SLA
Feature parity
What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.
Only on AthenaHQ
- AI Visibility Tracking (GEO Score). Monitors brand mention frequency, share of voice, and sentiment across 8 LLMs in real time, surfacing where a brand appears (or doesn't) in AI-generated answers.
- Athena Citation Engine (ACE). Machine-learning model trained on millions of AI search results that predicts the probability a given piece of content will be cited by an AI engine, enabling proactive content optimization.
- Ask Athena Agentic Copilot. Natural-language AI assistant inside the platform for querying visibility data, generating content gap recommendations, and surfacing competitive intelligence without manual report building.
Only on Linkup
- Fetch API. Synchronous URL content extraction in under 2 seconds, returns clean markdown
- Search API. Web search tool calls with sourced, cited answers and full-text snippets in 1-3 seconds
- Research API. Asynchronous deep research that runs multi-step reasoning over the web and returns a cited report
- Tunable index. Filter by source allowlist, freshness window and content type
- Private index. Deploy Linkup over your own proprietary documents
- Bring Your Own Cloud. Run the Linkup runtime inside your own AWS, GCP or Azure account
When each one wins
When AthenaHQ wins
- Platform coverage matters. AthenaHQ monitors 8 AI platforms; Linkup covers 0.
- Actionable, prioritized recommendations via the Action Center -- not just dashboards
When Linkup wins
- Budget is the constraint. Linkup starts at $0/mo vs AthenaHQ's $295/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
- You want the better-funded incumbent. Linkup has raised $13.2M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity.
- Built specifically as an API for AI agents and LLMs, not retrofitted from a consumer search product
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
- You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
- You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking AthenaHQ plus an agency.
- You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
- You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.
Reasons to pick one over the other
Reasons to pick AthenaHQ over Linkup
- Broader AI platform coverage. AthenaHQ tracks visibility across 8 AI engines vs Linkup's 0.
- More verified reviews. AthenaHQ has 32 G2 reviews vs Linkup's none on file, so the average rating carries more weight.
- Faster product velocity. AthenaHQ has shipped 3 public launches in the last year vs Linkup's 0.
- Wider integration ecosystem. AthenaHQ integrates with 15 tools; Linkup ships 7.
- What users praise most. Actionable, prioritized recommendations via the Action Center -- not just dashboards
Reasons to pick Linkup over AthenaHQ
- Lower entry price. Linkup starts at $0/mo vs AthenaHQ's $295/mo.
- More plan flexibility. Linkup offers 4 pricing tiers vs AthenaHQ's 2, so there's a better chance one fits your team size.
- Better-funded incumbent. Linkup has raised $13.2M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity than AthenaHQ ($2.7M).
- What users praise most. Built specifically as an API for AI agents and LLMs, not retrofitted from a consumer search product
- EU data residency. Linkup is HQ'd in Paris, France, which simplifies GDPR data-processor agreements for European buyers.
Switching from one to the other
From AthenaHQ to Linkup
Export your saved queries and prompt panels from AthenaHQ (most tools support CSV export). Most Linkup setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate Linkup's data againstAthenaHQ's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel AthenaHQ. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.
From Linkup to AthenaHQ
Same flow in reverse. Export from Linkup, import to AthenaHQ. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.
From either to GrowthManager.ai
We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.
Side by side, every number we could verify
| AthenaHQ | Linkup | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at (USD/mo) | $295/mo | $0/mo |
| Founded | 2025 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Paris, France |
| Funding raised | $2.7M | $13.2M |
| AI platforms tracked | 8 | — |
| G2 rating | 4.9 / 5 (32 reviews) | — |
| Named customers | 9 | 8 |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| HIPAA | — | — |
What real users say
Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.
AthenaHQ — what users praise
- Actionable, prioritized recommendations via the Action Center -- not just dashboards
- Granular, multi-engine visibility tracking that surfaces insights no prior tool could provide
- Measurable, documented lift in AI visibility and pipeline attribution
- Intuitive interface with a fast setup that non-technical users can adopt quickly
- Responsive support team that acts on user feedback quickly
AthenaHQ — what users complain about
- Credit-based pricing is opaque and causes surprise overages for active users
- Premium pricing ($295/mo+) excludes smaller businesses and agencies with budget-constrained clients
- Key features (ACE Citation Engine, Prompt Volume data, API) are locked behind Enterprise tier
- Sentiment and competitive benchmarking analytics are too shallow to be fully actionable
- Rapid product updates cause UI churn and make onboarding documentation go stale
Linkup — what users praise
- Built specifically as an API for AI agents and LLMs, not retrofitted from a consumer search product
- Licenses content from publishers and pays them on usage, so results are legal and citation-safe
- Sub-second search latency is fast enough for real-time agent tool calls
- Free tier ships 4,000 queries and startups can apply for $5,000 in credits
- SOC 2 Type II and ZDR are included at no additional cost on every plan
Linkup — what users complain about
- Per-request pricing makes monthly cost hard to forecast for high-volume agents
- Deep Research mode can cost up to $2.50 per call, expensive at scale
- Not a visibility, SEO or content product, it is a raw search API and you build the workflow yourself
- No G2 or Capterra reviews yet, the company only launched its API in late 2024
- Index is still smaller than incumbents like Google or Bing, niche queries can return thin results
A third option
Both AthenaHQ and Linkupare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.
Other comparisons in this space
Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, AthenaHQ or Linkup?
Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. AthenaHQ and Linkup are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Linkup for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.
How much do AthenaHQ and Linkup cost?
AthenaHQ starts at $295/mo. Linkup starts at $0/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.
Which AI platforms do AthenaHQ and Linkup cover?
AthenaHQ covers 8 AI platforms. Linkup covers an undisclosed number of. Most tools in this space monitor ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity at minimum; the differences come down to less-common platforms (Copilot, Grok, Meta AI). GrowthManager.ai monitors the same four primary platforms and acts on the data.
Do AthenaHQ and Linkup actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?
Both AthenaHQ and Linkup are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.
What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to AthenaHQ and Linkup?
GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.
Further reading
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
- Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
- Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
- Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
- Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
- Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
Disclosure + methodology
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.