★ Our pick
Pick
Sanity
Pick Sanity if you trust traction signals — they list 10 customers, Screaming Frog lists 0; and you want the better-funded company ($173M); and SOC 2 Type 2 matters for your security review.
Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026
Sanity vs Screaming Frog: which one wins in 2026?
Sanity and Screaming Frog both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Sanity has raised $173M, Screaming Frog has raised Bootstrapped; Sanity is the more-funded incumbent; Screaming Frog is the leaner challenger.
The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.
The verdict
Pick
Screaming Frog
Screaming Frog is the right pick if your team prefers their approach and pricing fits.
If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.
The case for Sanity
Sanity has raised $173M ($85M Series C led by Bullhound Capital, May 2025). Founded by Magnus Kongsli Hillestad, Even Westvang, Simen Svale Skogsrud, based in Oslo, Norway. On their site they list 10 named customers including Nike, Spotify, Figma, Burger King. Pricing starts at $0/mo.
Composable content cloud with real-time collaboration.
What people praise
- Rated #1 headless CMS on G2 for four consecutive years thanks to multiplayer editing and real-time collaboration.
- Sanity Studio is fully customizable in React code, giving developers more control than any visual CMS competitor.
- GROQ query language and real-time Content Lake APIs are uniquely powerful for complex content models.
- Visual Editing works across Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, and SvelteKit so frontend choice is not constrained.
Where it falls short
- Steep learning curve for non-developers; documentation gaps on advanced use cases are commonly cited in G2 reviews.
- Pricing scales aggressively with API calls and asset usage, making large content libraries expensive at runtime.
- Vendor lock-in is real because content is tied to GROQ and the Content Lake schema, making migrations painful.
- Requires developer involvement to set up schemas and Studio; not a click-to-publish tool like WordPress.
The case for Screaming Frog
Screaming Frog has raised Bootstrapped. Founded by Dan Sharp, based in Henley-in-Arden, UK. Pricing starts at $0/mo.
Desktop SEO crawler used by technical SEOs everywhere.
What people praise
- Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.
- Comprehensive technical audit catches broken links, redirect chains, duplicate content, missing canonicals, and metadata errors in one pass.
- Custom extraction with XPath and CSS selectors is repeatedly cited as the killer feature for scraping data no other crawler can pull.
- Recent integrations with OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini let users run prompts against scraped content during a crawl.
Where it falls short
- Desktop-only Java app, so reviewers complain there is no cloud dashboard and no way to share live crawl data with teammates.
- Heavy memory footprint, with users reporting that large sites (1M+ URLs) require 32GB RAM and database storage mode.
- UI looks dated and the learning curve is steep for non-technical users, especially around XPath extraction.
- No keyword research, backlink analysis, or rank tracking, so users still need a second tool for those workflows.
Pricing, tier by tier
Tier 1
Sanity
Free
$0
- 20 user seats
- 2 public datasets
- 10,000 documents
- 100GB assets and bandwidth
Screaming Frog
Free
$0
- Crawl up to 500 URLs per run
- Broken link and error detection
- Meta data analysis
- XML sitemap generation
Tier 2
Sanity
Growth
$15 per seat
- 50 user seats
- 2 datasets (private or public)
- 25,000 documents
- 100GB assets and bandwidth
Screaming Frog
Paid License
~$21/mo
- Unlimited URL crawl (memory permitting)
- JavaScript rendering and mobile usability audits
- Structured data validation
- AI integrations with OpenAI, Gemini, and Anthropic Claude
Tier 3
Sanity
Enterprise
Custom
- Custom user seats and roles
- Custom datasets and document limits
- SAML SSO and dedicated support
- Full audit trail and history API
Screaming Frog
Volume Discount (5-9 seats)
~$20/mo
- All paid license features
- Discounted bulk seats for agencies
Tier 4
Sanity
—
—
Screaming Frog
Volume Discount (20+ seats)
~$18/mo
- All paid license features
- Best per-seat rate for large teams
Feature parity
What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.
Only on Sanity
- Sanity Studio. Customizable React-based editorial interface with multiplayer editing and content workflows.
- Content Lake. Real-time content database queryable via GROQ with precision updates across environments.
- Visual Editing. In-context preview for Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, and SvelteKit so editors see changes live.
- Content Agent. AI-powered automation for transforming materials into structured content and auditing at scale.
- Agent Actions. Schema-aware automation triggered by content mutations for workflow automation.
- Content Releases. Precision scheduling and deployment of content changes across datasets.
Only on Screaming Frog
- Website Crawler. Breadth-first crawler that fetches URLs, response codes, redirects, page titles, meta descriptions, headings, and content.
- Custom Extraction. Pull any data from a page using XPath, CSS selectors, or regex during the crawl.
- JavaScript Rendering. Renders pages with a headless Chromium engine to crawl single-page apps and JS-heavy sites.
- Crawl Comparison. Diffs two crawls to surface changes in metadata, response codes, structure, and content between deploys.
- AI Prompt Integration. Run prompts against OpenAI, Claude, or Gemini for every URL during a crawl, for example to classify pages or generate alt text.
- Structured Data Validation. Audits JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFa against Google and Schema.org specs.
When each one wins
When Sanity wins
- You're enterprise and need to call a reference. Sanity lists 10 named customers; Screaming Frog lists 0.
- You want the better-funded incumbent. Sanity has raised $173M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity.
- Procurement requires SOC 2 Type 2. Sanity has it; Screaming Frog doesn't yet.
When Screaming Frog wins
- Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
- You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
- You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Sanity plus an agency.
- You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
- You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.
Reasons to pick one over the other
Reasons to pick Sanity over Screaming Frog
- Better-funded incumbent. Sanity has raised $173M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity than Screaming Frog (Bootstrapped).
- More named customers. Sanity lists 10 customers vs Screaming Frog's 0, including Nike, Spotify, Figma.
- SOC 2 Type 2. Sanity carries SOC 2 Type 2; Screaming Frog does not yet, which can hold up procurement.
- What users praise most. Rated #1 headless CMS on G2 for four consecutive years thanks to multiplayer editing and real-time collaboration.
Reasons to pick Screaming Frog over Sanity
- More plan flexibility. Screaming Frog offers 4 pricing tiers vs Sanity's 3, so there's a better chance one fits your team size.
- More verified reviews. Screaming Frog has 186 G2 reviews vs Sanity's none on file, so the average rating carries more weight.
- What users praise most. Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.
Switching from one to the other
From Sanity to Screaming Frog
Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Sanity (most tools support CSV export). Most Screaming Frog setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate Screaming Frog's data againstSanity's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Sanity. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.
From Screaming Frog to Sanity
Same flow in reverse. Export from Screaming Frog, import to Sanity. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.
From either to GrowthManager.ai
We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.
Side by side, every number we could verify
| Sanity | Screaming Frog | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at (USD/mo) | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Founded | 2015 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Oslo, Norway | Henley-in-Arden, UK |
| Funding raised | $173M | Bootstrapped |
| AI platforms tracked | — | — |
| G2 rating | 4.6 / 5 | 4.7 / 5 (186 reviews) |
| Named customers | 10 | — |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | ✓ Yes | — |
| GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| HIPAA | — | — |
What real users say
Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.
Sanity — what users praise
- Rated #1 headless CMS on G2 for four consecutive years thanks to multiplayer editing and real-time collaboration.
- Sanity Studio is fully customizable in React code, giving developers more control than any visual CMS competitor.
- GROQ query language and real-time Content Lake APIs are uniquely powerful for complex content models.
- Visual Editing works across Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, and SvelteKit so frontend choice is not constrained.
- Content Lake and Content Agent ship schema-aware AI automation for content transformation and auditing at scale.
Sanity — what users complain about
- Steep learning curve for non-developers; documentation gaps on advanced use cases are commonly cited in G2 reviews.
- Pricing scales aggressively with API calls and asset usage, making large content libraries expensive at runtime.
- Vendor lock-in is real because content is tied to GROQ and the Content Lake schema, making migrations painful.
- Requires developer involvement to set up schemas and Studio; not a click-to-publish tool like WordPress.
- No native AI search visibility tracking, so it does not address ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Gemini citations.
Screaming Frog — what users praise
- Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.
- Comprehensive technical audit catches broken links, redirect chains, duplicate content, missing canonicals, and metadata errors in one pass.
- Custom extraction with XPath and CSS selectors is repeatedly cited as the killer feature for scraping data no other crawler can pull.
- Recent integrations with OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini let users run prompts against scraped content during a crawl.
- One-time low annual fee ($21/mo equivalent) is dramatically cheaper than Semrush or Ahrefs site audits.
Screaming Frog — what users complain about
- Desktop-only Java app, so reviewers complain there is no cloud dashboard and no way to share live crawl data with teammates.
- Heavy memory footprint, with users reporting that large sites (1M+ URLs) require 32GB RAM and database storage mode.
- UI looks dated and the learning curve is steep for non-technical users, especially around XPath extraction.
- No keyword research, backlink analysis, or rank tracking, so users still need a second tool for those workflows.
- No collaboration features, so two SEOs cannot work on the same crawl results without exporting CSVs.
A third option
Both Sanity and Screaming Frogare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.
Other comparisons in this space
Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Sanity or Screaming Frog?
Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Sanity and Screaming Frog are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Sanity for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.
How much do Sanity and Screaming Frog cost?
Sanity starts at $0/mo. Screaming Frog starts at $0/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.
Do Sanity and Screaming Frog actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?
Both Sanity and Screaming Frog are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.
What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Sanity and Screaming Frog?
GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.
Further reading
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
- Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
- Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
- Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
- Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
- Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
Disclosure + methodology
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.