Pick
OnCrawl
Pick OnCrawl if you trust traction signals — they list 10 customers, You.com lists 5.
Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026
OnCrawl vs You.com: which one wins in 2026?
OnCrawl and You.com both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. You.com is the more-funded incumbent; OnCrawl is the leaner challenger.
The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.
The verdict
Pick
You.com
Pick You.com if you want the better-funded company ($195M across 4 rounds); and SOC 2 Type 2 matters for your security review.
If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.
The case for OnCrawl
Founded by Francois Goube, Tanguy Moal, based in Bordeaux, France. On their site they list 10 named customers including Adidas, L'Oreal, Ticketmaster, Harrods.
Enterprise SEO data platform combining crawl, logs, and AI insights.
What people praise
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
- Log file analyzer processes 500M+ log lines per day, surfacing how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI crawlers actually behave on the site.
- Cross-references crawl data, server logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic backlinks in one analysis - few competitors integrate all five sources.
- 100% unsampled data analysis appeals to enterprise SEOs frustrated with GA4 sampling and Search Console limits.
Where it falls short
- No public pricing - book-a-demo gating means SMBs and indie consultants are filtered out before evaluation.
- Capterra rating of 3.8 is the lowest among major technical SEO crawlers, with reviewers citing UI complexity and pricing opacity.
- Steep learning curve - the platform assumes data-science fluency, which leaves marketers needing a technical SEO specialist to extract value.
- Self-serve onboarding is limited; complex multi-source setups (logs plus crawl plus analytics) typically need OnCrawl's customer success team.
The case for You.com
You.com has raised $195M across 4 rounds (Series C, $100M, 2025 ($1.5B valuation)). Founded by Richard Socher, Bryan McCann, based in Palo Alto, CA. On their site they list 5 named customers including OpenAI, Amazon, Alibaba, DuckDuckGo. Pricing starts at $1/mo.
AI search assistant with customizable agents and apps.
What people praise
- 300ms p99 latency on Search API is roughly 2x faster than competing web search APIs, important for real-time agent applications.
- SOC 2 certified with zero-data-retention options, which clears most enterprise procurement gates for AI builders.
- Customer list includes OpenAI, Amazon, Alibaba, DuckDuckGo, and Salesforce, the strongest reference base in the AI search API category.
- Pay-as-you-go pricing with $100 free credit removes friction for developers prototyping AI agents.
Where it falls short
- You.com pivoted away from the consumer search product to focus on APIs in 2024-2025, leaving the consumer offering thin and confusing.
- Finance Research API at $110 per 1,000 calls is expensive enough to limit it to high-margin financial workflows only.
- Limited public G2 footprint with only ~20 reviews makes social proof for procurement harder versus established APIs.
- Pricing is purely metered, so monthly costs are unpredictable for high-volume use cases without committed contracts.
Pricing, tier by tier
Tier 1
OnCrawl
—
—
You.com
Search API
$5 per 1,000 calls
- Up to 100 URLs per call
- News endpoint included at no extra cost
- LLM-ready snippets with metadata
- Country and language targeting filters
Tier 2
OnCrawl
—
—
You.com
Contents API
$1 per 1,000 pages
- Multiple URLs per request
- Clean Markdown or raw HTML output
- Python SDK, MCP Server, REST API access
Tier 3
OnCrawl
—
—
You.com
Research API (Lite)
$12 per 1,000 calls
- Cited, source-backed answers
- Multi-step search and synthesis pipeline
- Inline references
- Ranked #1 in DeepSearchQA per You.com
Tier 4
OnCrawl
—
—
You.com
Finance Research API (Deep)
$110 per 1,000 calls
- Coverage of filings, macro data, markets
- Derived financial calculations
- Traceable source references
- Precision financial intelligence
Feature parity
What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.
Only on OnCrawl
- SEO Crawler. JavaScript-capable cloud crawler that audits 300M+ URLs, mapping site architecture, internal linking, and orphan pages.
- Log File Analyzer. Processes 500M+ log lines daily to show how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI bots interact with the site.
- Data3 Cross-Analysis. Combines crawl, logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic data in unified reports with custom segmentation.
- SEO Impact Report. Connects technical SEO metrics to business outcomes like organic revenue and conversions.
- REST API. Full developer API with automated crawl scheduling and log ingestion for enterprise SEO automation.
Only on You.com
- Search API. Real-time web search optimized for AI agents with 300ms p99 latency and structured LLM-ready snippets.
- Contents API. Clean web page content extraction from any URL, returning Markdown or HTML at $1 per 1,000 pages.
- Research API. Multi-step search and synthesis pipeline that returns cited, source-backed answers, ranked #1 in DeepSearchQA per You.com.
- Finance Research API. Domain-specific research API covering SEC filings, macro data, markets, and derived calculations.
- MCP Server. Native MCP server to plug You.com directly into Cursor, VS Code, Claude Code, and any MCP-enabled IDE.
- Zero Data Retention. Enterprise option that ensures no customer query or content data is retained, important for regulated industries.
When each one wins
When OnCrawl wins
- You're enterprise and need to call a reference. OnCrawl lists 10 named customers; You.com lists 5.
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
When You.com wins
- Budget is the constraint. You.com starts at $1/mo vs OnCrawl's $∞/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
- You want the better-funded incumbent. You.com has raised $195M across 4 rounds, giving it more runway and shipping velocity.
- Procurement requires SOC 2 Type 2. You.com has it; OnCrawl doesn't yet.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
- You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
- You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking OnCrawl plus an agency.
- You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
- You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.
Reasons to pick one over the other
Reasons to pick OnCrawl over You.com
- More named customers. OnCrawl lists 10 customers vs You.com's 5, including Adidas, L'Oreal, Ticketmaster.
- More mature platform. OnCrawl (founded 2013) has had more time to harden the product than You.com (2020).
- What users praise most. JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
- EU data residency. OnCrawl is HQ'd in Bordeaux, France, which simplifies GDPR data-processor agreements for European buyers.
Reasons to pick You.com over OnCrawl
- Lower entry price. You.com publishes a clear entry tier at $1/mo; OnCrawl gates pricing.
- Public pricing. You.com publishes 4 tiers on its website; OnCrawl requires a sales conversation.
- Better-funded incumbent. You.com has raised $195M across 4 rounds, giving it more runway and shipping velocity than OnCrawl.
- SOC 2 Type 2. You.com carries SOC 2 Type 2; OnCrawl does not yet, which can hold up procurement.
- More verified reviews. You.com has 20 G2 reviews vs OnCrawl's none on file, so the average rating carries more weight.
- Built for the LLM era. You.com was founded in 2020, built around AI search from day one; OnCrawl dates back to 2013 and is retrofitting.
- What users praise most. 300ms p99 latency on Search API is roughly 2x faster than competing web search APIs, important for real-time agent applications.
Switching from one to the other
From OnCrawl to You.com
Export your saved queries and prompt panels from OnCrawl (most tools support CSV export). Most You.com setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate You.com's data againstOnCrawl's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel OnCrawl. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.
From You.com to OnCrawl
Same flow in reverse. Export from You.com, import to OnCrawl. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.
From either to GrowthManager.ai
We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.
Side by side, every number we could verify
| OnCrawl | You.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at (USD/mo) | Custom | $1/mo |
| Founded | 2013 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Bordeaux, France | Palo Alto, CA |
| Funding raised | — | $195M across 4 rounds |
| AI platforms tracked | — | — |
| G2 rating | 4.4 / 5 | — |
| Named customers | 10 | 5 |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | — | ✓ Yes |
| GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| HIPAA | — | — |
What real users say
Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.
OnCrawl — what users praise
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
- Log file analyzer processes 500M+ log lines per day, surfacing how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI crawlers actually behave on the site.
- Cross-references crawl data, server logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic backlinks in one analysis - few competitors integrate all five sources.
- 100% unsampled data analysis appeals to enterprise SEOs frustrated with GA4 sampling and Search Console limits.
- 30-day ROI guarantee gives risk cover for enterprise buyers piloting against incumbent BrightEdge or Conductor deployments.
OnCrawl — what users complain about
- No public pricing - book-a-demo gating means SMBs and indie consultants are filtered out before evaluation.
- Capterra rating of 3.8 is the lowest among major technical SEO crawlers, with reviewers citing UI complexity and pricing opacity.
- Steep learning curve - the platform assumes data-science fluency, which leaves marketers needing a technical SEO specialist to extract value.
- Self-serve onboarding is limited; complex multi-source setups (logs plus crawl plus analytics) typically need OnCrawl's customer success team.
- BrightEdge ownership raises long-term roadmap questions for customers who prefer best-of-breed technical SEO over consolidated suites.
You.com — what users praise
- 300ms p99 latency on Search API is roughly 2x faster than competing web search APIs, important for real-time agent applications.
- SOC 2 certified with zero-data-retention options, which clears most enterprise procurement gates for AI builders.
- Customer list includes OpenAI, Amazon, Alibaba, DuckDuckGo, and Salesforce, the strongest reference base in the AI search API category.
- Pay-as-you-go pricing with $100 free credit removes friction for developers prototyping AI agents.
- Research API is purpose-built for grounded RAG with inline citations, easier than wiring up SerpAPI + content extraction yourself.
You.com — what users complain about
- You.com pivoted away from the consumer search product to focus on APIs in 2024-2025, leaving the consumer offering thin and confusing.
- Finance Research API at $110 per 1,000 calls is expensive enough to limit it to high-margin financial workflows only.
- Limited public G2 footprint with only ~20 reviews makes social proof for procurement harder versus established APIs.
- Pricing is purely metered, so monthly costs are unpredictable for high-volume use cases without committed contracts.
- API-first focus means it competes with Brave Search, SerpAPI, Tavily, Linkup, and Perplexity API, a crowded space.
A third option
Both OnCrawl and You.comare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.
Other comparisons in this space
Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, OnCrawl or You.com?
Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. OnCrawl and You.com are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick OnCrawl for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.
How much do OnCrawl and You.com cost?
OnCrawl starts at Custom. You.com starts at $1/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.
Do OnCrawl and You.com actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?
Both OnCrawl and You.com are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.
What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to OnCrawl and You.com?
GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.
Further reading
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
- Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
- Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
- Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
- Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
- Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
Disclosure + methodology
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.