Pick
OnCrawl
Pick OnCrawl if you trust traction signals — they list 10 customers, Rank Math lists 0.
Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026
OnCrawl vs Rank Math: which one wins in 2026?
OnCrawl and Rank Math both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Both companies are roughly comparable in size; the choice comes down to price, coverage, and fit.
The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.
The verdict
Pick
Rank Math
Rank Math is the right pick if your team prefers their approach and pricing fits.
If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.
The case for OnCrawl
Founded by Francois Goube, Tanguy Moal, based in Bordeaux, France. On their site they list 10 named customers including Adidas, L'Oreal, Ticketmaster, Harrods.
Enterprise SEO data platform combining crawl, logs, and AI insights.
What people praise
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
- Log file analyzer processes 500M+ log lines per day, surfacing how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI crawlers actually behave on the site.
- Cross-references crawl data, server logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic backlinks in one analysis - few competitors integrate all five sources.
- 100% unsampled data analysis appeals to enterprise SEOs frustrated with GA4 sampling and Search Console limits.
Where it falls short
- No public pricing - book-a-demo gating means SMBs and indie consultants are filtered out before evaluation.
- Capterra rating of 3.8 is the lowest among major technical SEO crawlers, with reviewers citing UI complexity and pricing opacity.
- Steep learning curve - the platform assumes data-science fluency, which leaves marketers needing a technical SEO specialist to extract value.
- Self-serve onboarding is limited; complex multi-source setups (logs plus crawl plus analytics) typically need OnCrawl's customer success team.
The case for Rank Math
Rank Math has raised Bootstrapped. Founded by Bhanu Ahluwalia, Nimit Kashyap, Suraj Vibhute, based in Kolkata, India. Pricing starts at $9/mo.
WordPress SEO plugin with content AI and schema generation.
What people praise
- Free version is feature-rich enough that most personal sites never need to upgrade , unlimited focus keywords, redirect manager, GSC integration, 20+ schema types, and WooCommerce SEO are all free.
- Setup wizard auto-configures critical SEO settings, integrates Google Search Console, and generates XML sitemaps in under five minutes.
- Modular design lets users enable or disable only the modules they need, which reviewers say keeps the plugin lightweight versus Yoast.
- Schema generator supports 840+ types out of the box, which is the broadest schema coverage of any WordPress SEO plugin.
Where it falls short
- Performance can slow down on very large sites when many modules are enabled simultaneously.
- Content AI feature outputs underwhelming text and the credit system racks up subscription costs quickly with heavy use.
- Content grading is rigid , pages that rank #1 sometimes score 'poor' because the grader fixates on keyword density and word count over user intent.
- Sheer number of options and modules is overwhelming for new WordPress users, who often turn modules off and miss the benefits.
Pricing, tier by tier
Tier 1
OnCrawl
—
—
Rank Math
PRO
$8.61/mo
- Unlimited personal websites
- 500 keyword rank tracking
- Content AI Starter (30-day trial)
- Schema generator with 840+ types
Tier 2
OnCrawl
—
—
Rank Math
Business
$26.93/mo
- 100 client websites
- 10,000 keyword rank tracking
- Content AI Creator (30-day trial)
- Priority 24/7 support
Tier 3
OnCrawl
—
—
Rank Math
Agency
$59.27/mo
- 500 client websites
- 50,000 keyword rank tracking
- Content AI Expert (30-day trial)
- White-label reporting
Tier 4
OnCrawl
—
—
Rank Math
Rank Math + WP Rocket Bundle
$12.92/mo
- PRO features
- WP Rocket performance plugin
- Single-site bundle pricing
Feature parity
What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.
Only on OnCrawl
- SEO Crawler. JavaScript-capable cloud crawler that audits 300M+ URLs, mapping site architecture, internal linking, and orphan pages.
- Log File Analyzer. Processes 500M+ log lines daily to show how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI bots interact with the site.
- Data3 Cross-Analysis. Combines crawl, logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic data in unified reports with custom segmentation.
- SEO Impact Report. Connects technical SEO metrics to business outcomes like organic revenue and conversions.
- REST API. Full developer API with automated crawl scheduling and log ingestion for enterprise SEO automation.
Only on Rank Math
- On-Page SEO Analysis. Real-time content score with focus keyword recommendations, readability checks, and SERP preview.
- Schema Generator. Adds structured data with 840+ schema types including Article, FAQ, HowTo, Product, Recipe, Review, and Local Business.
- Content AI. AI assistant inside the WordPress editor that suggests word count, headings, links, related keywords, and FAQs based on top-ranking pages.
- Rank Tracker. Native keyword rank tracker with 500 to 50,000 keyword limits depending on tier.
- Google Analytics 4 Integration. Shows impressions, clicks, and average position directly inside the WordPress dashboard.
- llms.txt Support. Generates llms.txt so AI crawlers can understand site structure, added in 2026.
When each one wins
When OnCrawl wins
- You're enterprise and need to call a reference. OnCrawl lists 10 named customers; Rank Math lists 0.
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
When Rank Math wins
- Budget is the constraint. Rank Math starts at $9/mo vs OnCrawl's $∞/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
- Free version is feature-rich enough that most personal sites never need to upgrade , unlimited focus keywords, redirect manager, GSC integration, 20+ schema types, and WooCommerce SEO are all free.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
- You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
- You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking OnCrawl plus an agency.
- You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
- You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.
Reasons to pick one over the other
Reasons to pick OnCrawl over Rank Math
- More named customers. OnCrawl lists 10 customers vs Rank Math's 0, including Adidas, L'Oreal, Ticketmaster.
- What users praise most. JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
- EU data residency. OnCrawl is HQ'd in Bordeaux, France, which simplifies GDPR data-processor agreements for European buyers.
Reasons to pick Rank Math over OnCrawl
- Lower entry price. Rank Math publishes a clear entry tier at $9/mo; OnCrawl gates pricing.
- Public pricing. Rank Math publishes 4 tiers on its website; OnCrawl requires a sales conversation.
- Higher G2 rating. Rank Math averages 4.7/5 on G2 across 60 reviews; OnCrawl averages 4.4.
- What users praise most. Free version is feature-rich enough that most personal sites never need to upgrade , unlimited focus keywords, redirect manager, GSC integration, 20+ schema types, and WooCommerce SEO are all free.
Switching from one to the other
From OnCrawl to Rank Math
Export your saved queries and prompt panels from OnCrawl (most tools support CSV export). Most Rank Math setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate Rank Math's data againstOnCrawl's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel OnCrawl. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.
From Rank Math to OnCrawl
Same flow in reverse. Export from Rank Math, import to OnCrawl. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.
From either to GrowthManager.ai
We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.
Side by side, every number we could verify
| OnCrawl | Rank Math | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at (USD/mo) | Custom | $9/mo |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Bordeaux, France | Kolkata, India |
| Funding raised | — | Bootstrapped |
| AI platforms tracked | — | — |
| G2 rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.7 / 5 (60 reviews) |
| Named customers | 10 | — |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | — | — |
| GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| HIPAA | — | — |
What real users say
Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.
OnCrawl — what users praise
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
- Log file analyzer processes 500M+ log lines per day, surfacing how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI crawlers actually behave on the site.
- Cross-references crawl data, server logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic backlinks in one analysis - few competitors integrate all five sources.
- 100% unsampled data analysis appeals to enterprise SEOs frustrated with GA4 sampling and Search Console limits.
- 30-day ROI guarantee gives risk cover for enterprise buyers piloting against incumbent BrightEdge or Conductor deployments.
OnCrawl — what users complain about
- No public pricing - book-a-demo gating means SMBs and indie consultants are filtered out before evaluation.
- Capterra rating of 3.8 is the lowest among major technical SEO crawlers, with reviewers citing UI complexity and pricing opacity.
- Steep learning curve - the platform assumes data-science fluency, which leaves marketers needing a technical SEO specialist to extract value.
- Self-serve onboarding is limited; complex multi-source setups (logs plus crawl plus analytics) typically need OnCrawl's customer success team.
- BrightEdge ownership raises long-term roadmap questions for customers who prefer best-of-breed technical SEO over consolidated suites.
Rank Math — what users praise
- Free version is feature-rich enough that most personal sites never need to upgrade , unlimited focus keywords, redirect manager, GSC integration, 20+ schema types, and WooCommerce SEO are all free.
- Setup wizard auto-configures critical SEO settings, integrates Google Search Console, and generates XML sitemaps in under five minutes.
- Modular design lets users enable or disable only the modules they need, which reviewers say keeps the plugin lightweight versus Yoast.
- Schema generator supports 840+ types out of the box, which is the broadest schema coverage of any WordPress SEO plugin.
- WooCommerce SEO is bundled in the free tier, while Yoast charges separately for the WooCommerce add-on.
Rank Math — what users complain about
- Performance can slow down on very large sites when many modules are enabled simultaneously.
- Content AI feature outputs underwhelming text and the credit system racks up subscription costs quickly with heavy use.
- Content grading is rigid , pages that rank #1 sometimes score 'poor' because the grader fixates on keyword density and word count over user intent.
- Sheer number of options and modules is overwhelming for new WordPress users, who often turn modules off and miss the benefits.
- Trustpilot has billing complaints about auto-renewal, license activation, and slow refund processing.
A third option
Both OnCrawl and Rank Mathare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.
Other comparisons in this space
Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, OnCrawl or Rank Math?
Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. OnCrawl and Rank Math are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick OnCrawl for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.
How much do OnCrawl and Rank Math cost?
OnCrawl starts at Custom. Rank Math starts at $9/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.
Do OnCrawl and Rank Math actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?
Both OnCrawl and Rank Math are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.
What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to OnCrawl and Rank Math?
GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.
Further reading
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
- Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
- Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
- Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
- Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
- Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
Disclosure + methodology
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.