Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026

Mention vs OnCrawl: which one wins in 2026?

Mention and OnCrawl both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Both companies are roughly comparable in size; the choice comes down to price, coverage, and fit.

The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.

The verdict
Pick

Mention

Mention is the right pick if your team prefers their approach and pricing fits.

Pick

OnCrawl

Pick OnCrawl if you trust traction signals — they list 10 customers, Mention lists 0.

If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.

The case for Mention

Founded by Edouard Reinach, based in Paris, France. Pricing starts at $49/mo.

Real-time media monitoring and social listening for brands and PR teams.

What people praise

  • Coverage spans 1B+ sources including Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, TikTok, Pinterest, and YouTube plus 75+ review sites like Google, Trustpilot, and Amazon.
  • Boolean search operators and advanced filtering let teams cut signal from noise in ways the cheaper alternatives like Brand24 cannot match.
  • Spike Alerts catch unusual mention volume early so PR teams can respond to crises within minutes, not hours.
  • Historical data goes back up to two years before project creation, useful when retroactively benchmarking a campaign.

Where it falls short

  • Self-serve Solo, Pro, and Pro Plus tiers were discontinued in July 2025, leaving Company at $599/mo as the only option for new customers.
  • Publishing and social engagement features were retired in January 2026, with users redirected to Agorapulse, which doubled the tool stack for many teams.
  • Trustpilot reviews flag slow and unhelpful customer support, especially around billing disputes.
  • The $599/mo Company plan requires annual commitment with no monthly option, which excludes solopreneurs and small agencies.

The case for OnCrawl

Founded by Francois Goube, Tanguy Moal, based in Bordeaux, France. On their site they list 10 named customers including Adidas, L'Oreal, Ticketmaster, Harrods.

Enterprise SEO data platform combining crawl, logs, and AI insights.

What people praise

  • JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
  • Log file analyzer processes 500M+ log lines per day, surfacing how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI crawlers actually behave on the site.
  • Cross-references crawl data, server logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic backlinks in one analysis - few competitors integrate all five sources.
  • 100% unsampled data analysis appeals to enterprise SEOs frustrated with GA4 sampling and Search Console limits.

Where it falls short

  • No public pricing - book-a-demo gating means SMBs and indie consultants are filtered out before evaluation.
  • Capterra rating of 3.8 is the lowest among major technical SEO crawlers, with reviewers citing UI complexity and pricing opacity.
  • Steep learning curve - the platform assumes data-science fluency, which leaves marketers needing a technical SEO specialist to extract value.
  • Self-serve onboarding is limited; complex multi-source setups (logs plus crawl plus analytics) typically need OnCrawl's customer success team.

Pricing, tier by tier

Tier 1
Mention
Solo (legacy)
$49/mo
  • Basic real-time monitoring
  • Limited keyword alerts
  • Single user
OnCrawl
Tier 2
Mention
Pro (legacy)
$99/mo
  • Boolean search
  • More keyword alerts
  • Sentiment analysis
  • Multi-user
OnCrawl
Tier 3
Mention
Pro Plus (legacy)
$179/mo
  • Higher keyword and alert limits
  • Share of Voice reporting
  • Competitor benchmarking
  • Multi-user collaboration
OnCrawl
Tier 4
Mention
Company
$599/mo
  • Real-time monitoring across 1B+ sources
  • Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, TikTok, Pinterest, YouTube coverage
  • Review monitoring across 75+ platforms including Google, Trustpilot, Amazon
  • Advanced Boolean search
OnCrawl

Feature parity

What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.

Only on Mention
  • Real-Time Mention Monitoring. Streams mentions from 1B+ sources across web, news, blogs, and social platforms as they happen.
  • Boolean Search Builder. Advanced query syntax for keyword combinations, exclusions, country and language filters.
  • Sentiment Analysis. Auto-classifies mentions as positive, negative, or neutral with manual override.
  • Spike Alerts. Detects sudden mention volume increases and notifies the team for crisis response or trend capture.
  • Share of Voice Reporting. Benchmarks brand mention share against named competitors with custom dashboards and 100+ metrics.
  • Review Site Monitoring. Pulls reviews from 75+ platforms including Google, Trustpilot, Amazon, and TripAdvisor into a single feed.
Only on OnCrawl
  • SEO Crawler. JavaScript-capable cloud crawler that audits 300M+ URLs, mapping site architecture, internal linking, and orphan pages.
  • Log File Analyzer. Processes 500M+ log lines daily to show how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI bots interact with the site.
  • Data3 Cross-Analysis. Combines crawl, logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic data in unified reports with custom segmentation.
  • SEO Impact Report. Connects technical SEO metrics to business outcomes like organic revenue and conversions.
  • REST API. Full developer API with automated crawl scheduling and log ingestion for enterprise SEO automation.

When each one wins

When Mention wins
  • Budget is the constraint. Mention starts at $49/mo vs OnCrawl's $∞/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
  • Coverage spans 1B+ sources including Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, TikTok, Pinterest, and YouTube plus 75+ review sites like Google, Trustpilot, and Amazon.
When OnCrawl wins
  • You're enterprise and need to call a reference. OnCrawl lists 10 named customers; Mention lists 0.
  • JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
  • You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
  • You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Mention plus an agency.
  • You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
  • You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.

Reasons to pick one over the other

Reasons to pick Mention over OnCrawl

  1. Lower entry price. Mention publishes a clear entry tier at $49/mo; OnCrawl gates pricing.
  2. Public pricing. Mention publishes 4 tiers on its website; OnCrawl requires a sales conversation.
  3. What users praise most. Coverage spans 1B+ sources including Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, TikTok, Pinterest, and YouTube plus 75+ review sites like Google, Trustpilot, and Amazon.

Reasons to pick OnCrawl over Mention

  1. More named customers. OnCrawl lists 10 customers vs Mention's 0, including Adidas, L'Oreal, Ticketmaster.
  2. What users praise most. JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.

Switching from one to the other

From Mention to OnCrawl

Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Mention (most tools support CSV export). Most OnCrawl setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate OnCrawl's data againstMention's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Mention. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.

From OnCrawl to Mention

Same flow in reverse. Export from OnCrawl, import to Mention. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.

From either to GrowthManager.ai

We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.

Side by side, every number we could verify

MentionOnCrawl
Starts at (USD/mo)$49/moCustom
Founded20122013
HeadquartersParis, FranceBordeaux, France
Funding raised
AI platforms tracked
G2 rating4.4 / 5
Named customers10
SOC 2 Type 2
GDPR✓ Yes✓ Yes
HIPAA

What real users say

Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.

Mentionwhat users praise

  • Coverage spans 1B+ sources including Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, TikTok, Pinterest, and YouTube plus 75+ review sites like Google, Trustpilot, and Amazon.
  • Boolean search operators and advanced filtering let teams cut signal from noise in ways the cheaper alternatives like Brand24 cannot match.
  • Spike Alerts catch unusual mention volume early so PR teams can respond to crises within minutes, not hours.
  • Historical data goes back up to two years before project creation, useful when retroactively benchmarking a campaign.
  • Real-time monitoring feed pulls new mentions in as they happen, which reviewers consistently call out as best-in-class.

Mentionwhat users complain about

  • Self-serve Solo, Pro, and Pro Plus tiers were discontinued in July 2025, leaving Company at $599/mo as the only option for new customers.
  • Publishing and social engagement features were retired in January 2026, with users redirected to Agorapulse, which doubled the tool stack for many teams.
  • Trustpilot reviews flag slow and unhelpful customer support, especially around billing disputes.
  • The $599/mo Company plan requires annual commitment with no monthly option, which excludes solopreneurs and small agencies.
  • Reviewers warn that mentions can be missed if Boolean searches are not configured carefully - the tool is powerful but not plug-and-play.

OnCrawlwhat users praise

  • JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
  • Log file analyzer processes 500M+ log lines per day, surfacing how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI crawlers actually behave on the site.
  • Cross-references crawl data, server logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic backlinks in one analysis - few competitors integrate all five sources.
  • 100% unsampled data analysis appeals to enterprise SEOs frustrated with GA4 sampling and Search Console limits.
  • 30-day ROI guarantee gives risk cover for enterprise buyers piloting against incumbent BrightEdge or Conductor deployments.

OnCrawlwhat users complain about

  • No public pricing - book-a-demo gating means SMBs and indie consultants are filtered out before evaluation.
  • Capterra rating of 3.8 is the lowest among major technical SEO crawlers, with reviewers citing UI complexity and pricing opacity.
  • Steep learning curve - the platform assumes data-science fluency, which leaves marketers needing a technical SEO specialist to extract value.
  • Self-serve onboarding is limited; complex multi-source setups (logs plus crawl plus analytics) typically need OnCrawl's customer success team.
  • BrightEdge ownership raises long-term roadmap questions for customers who prefer best-of-breed technical SEO over consolidated suites.

A third option

Both Mention and OnCrawlare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Mention or OnCrawl?

Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Mention and OnCrawl are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Mention for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.

How much do Mention and OnCrawl cost?

Mention starts at $49/mo. OnCrawl starts at Custom. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.

Do Mention and OnCrawl actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?

Both Mention and OnCrawl are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.

What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Mention and OnCrawl?

GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.

Further reading

External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.

  1. Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft

    How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.

  2. Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig

    Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.

  3. Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner

    Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.

  4. Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro

    Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.

  5. Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman

    The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.

Disclosure + methodology

GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.