Pick
Majestic
Pick Majestic if you need broader AI platform coverage (1 platforms vs 0).
Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026
Majestic vs OnCrawl: which one wins in 2026?
Majestic and OnCrawl both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Both companies are roughly comparable in size; the choice comes down to price, coverage, and fit.
The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.
The verdict
Pick
OnCrawl
Pick OnCrawl if you trust traction signals — they list 10 customers, Majestic lists 0.
If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.
The case for Majestic
Founded by Alex Chudnovsky, based in Birmingham, UK. They cover 1 AI platforms. Pricing starts at $50/mo.
Backlink index and link intelligence platform with Trust Flow and Citation Flow.
What people praise
- One of the largest historical backlink indexes on the market, dating to 2008
- Proprietary Trust Flow and Citation Flow metrics are widely cited by SEO professionals
- Fresh Index is updated daily, useful for tracking newly acquired or lost links
- Clique Hunter finds sites linking to multiple competitors at once, surfaces link gap opportunities
Where it falls short
- Interface feels dated compared to Ahrefs and Semrush, often described as slow to load
- Single-purpose tool, no keyword research, rank tracking, on-page SEO, technical audits, or AI content guidance
- Lite tier locks Historic Index behind Pro, limits backlink history research
- API tier at $399.99 is steep for teams that just want bulk data exports
The case for OnCrawl
Founded by Francois Goube, Tanguy Moal, based in Bordeaux, France. On their site they list 10 named customers including Adidas, L'Oreal, Ticketmaster, Harrods.
Enterprise SEO data platform combining crawl, logs, and AI insights.
What people praise
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
- Log file analyzer processes 500M+ log lines per day, surfacing how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI crawlers actually behave on the site.
- Cross-references crawl data, server logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic backlinks in one analysis - few competitors integrate all five sources.
- 100% unsampled data analysis appeals to enterprise SEOs frustrated with GA4 sampling and Search Console limits.
Where it falls short
- No public pricing - book-a-demo gating means SMBs and indie consultants are filtered out before evaluation.
- Capterra rating of 3.8 is the lowest among major technical SEO crawlers, with reviewers citing UI complexity and pricing opacity.
- Steep learning curve - the platform assumes data-science fluency, which leaves marketers needing a technical SEO specialist to extract value.
- Self-serve onboarding is limited; complex multi-source setups (logs plus crawl plus analytics) typically need OnCrawl's customer success team.
Pricing, tier by tier
Tier 1
Majestic
Lite
$49.99/mo
- Fresh Index access
- Site Explorer (limited)
- 5 million Analysis Units
- Trust Flow and Citation Flow metrics
OnCrawl
—
—
Tier 2
Majestic
Pro
$99.99/mo
- Historic Index access
- Full Site Explorer
- 20 million Analysis Units
- Clique Hunter
OnCrawl
—
—
Tier 3
Majestic
API
$399.99/mo
- Everything in Pro
- Full API access for custom dashboards
- OpenApps integrations
- Largest data extracts
OnCrawl
—
—
Feature parity
What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.
Only on Majestic
- Fresh Index. Daily-updated backlink index used for tracking recent link activity
- Historic Index. Long-tail historical backlink database with data back to 2008
- Trust Flow. Proprietary metric scoring the trustworthiness of links based on connection to seed trusted sites
- Citation Flow. Proprietary metric measuring the quantity-based influence of a URL or domain
- Site Explorer. Backlink profile view with referring domains, anchor text, and link context
- Clique Hunter. Identifies domains that link to multiple competitors but not to you
Only on OnCrawl
- SEO Crawler. JavaScript-capable cloud crawler that audits 300M+ URLs, mapping site architecture, internal linking, and orphan pages.
- Log File Analyzer. Processes 500M+ log lines daily to show how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI bots interact with the site.
- Data3 Cross-Analysis. Combines crawl, logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic data in unified reports with custom segmentation.
- SEO Impact Report. Connects technical SEO metrics to business outcomes like organic revenue and conversions.
- REST API. Full developer API with automated crawl scheduling and log ingestion for enterprise SEO automation.
When each one wins
When Majestic wins
- Budget is the constraint. Majestic starts at $50/mo vs OnCrawl's $∞/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
- Platform coverage matters. Majestic monitors 1 AI platforms; OnCrawl covers 0.
- One of the largest historical backlink indexes on the market, dating to 2008
When OnCrawl wins
- You're enterprise and need to call a reference. OnCrawl lists 10 named customers; Majestic lists 0.
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
- You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
- You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Majestic plus an agency.
- You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
- You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.
Reasons to pick one over the other
Reasons to pick Majestic over OnCrawl
- Lower entry price. Majestic publishes a clear entry tier at $50/mo; OnCrawl gates pricing.
- Public pricing. Majestic publishes 3 tiers on its website; OnCrawl requires a sales conversation.
- Broader AI platform coverage. Majestic tracks visibility across 1 AI engines vs OnCrawl's 0.
- More mature platform. Majestic (founded 2004) has had more time to harden the product than OnCrawl (2013).
- What users praise most. One of the largest historical backlink indexes on the market, dating to 2008
Reasons to pick OnCrawl over Majestic
- More named customers. OnCrawl lists 10 customers vs Majestic's 0, including Adidas, L'Oreal, Ticketmaster.
- Faster product velocity. OnCrawl has shipped 5 public launches in the last year vs Majestic's 0.
- Built for the LLM era. OnCrawl was founded in 2013, built around AI search from day one; Majestic dates back to 2004 and is retrofitting.
- Wider integration ecosystem. OnCrawl integrates with 8 tools; Majestic ships 4.
- What users praise most. JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
Switching from one to the other
From Majestic to OnCrawl
Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Majestic (most tools support CSV export). Most OnCrawl setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate OnCrawl's data againstMajestic's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Majestic. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.
From OnCrawl to Majestic
Same flow in reverse. Export from OnCrawl, import to Majestic. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.
From either to GrowthManager.ai
We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.
Side by side, every number we could verify
| Majestic | OnCrawl | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at (USD/mo) | $50/mo | Custom |
| Founded | 2004 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Birmingham, UK | Bordeaux, France |
| Funding raised | — | — |
| AI platforms tracked | 1 | — |
| G2 rating | — | 4.4 / 5 |
| Named customers | — | 10 |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | — | — |
| GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| HIPAA | — | — |
What real users say
Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.
Majestic — what users praise
- One of the largest historical backlink indexes on the market, dating to 2008
- Proprietary Trust Flow and Citation Flow metrics are widely cited by SEO professionals
- Fresh Index is updated daily, useful for tracking newly acquired or lost links
- Clique Hunter finds sites linking to multiple competitors at once, surfaces link gap opportunities
- Bulk Backlink Checker handles large URL lists for agency-scale audits
Majestic — what users complain about
- Interface feels dated compared to Ahrefs and Semrush, often described as slow to load
- Single-purpose tool, no keyword research, rank tracking, on-page SEO, technical audits, or AI content guidance
- Lite tier locks Historic Index behind Pro, limits backlink history research
- API tier at $399.99 is steep for teams that just want bulk data exports
- No native Looker Studio connector, integration requires third-party tools
OnCrawl — what users praise
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
- Log file analyzer processes 500M+ log lines per day, surfacing how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI crawlers actually behave on the site.
- Cross-references crawl data, server logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic backlinks in one analysis - few competitors integrate all five sources.
- 100% unsampled data analysis appeals to enterprise SEOs frustrated with GA4 sampling and Search Console limits.
- 30-day ROI guarantee gives risk cover for enterprise buyers piloting against incumbent BrightEdge or Conductor deployments.
OnCrawl — what users complain about
- No public pricing - book-a-demo gating means SMBs and indie consultants are filtered out before evaluation.
- Capterra rating of 3.8 is the lowest among major technical SEO crawlers, with reviewers citing UI complexity and pricing opacity.
- Steep learning curve - the platform assumes data-science fluency, which leaves marketers needing a technical SEO specialist to extract value.
- Self-serve onboarding is limited; complex multi-source setups (logs plus crawl plus analytics) typically need OnCrawl's customer success team.
- BrightEdge ownership raises long-term roadmap questions for customers who prefer best-of-breed technical SEO over consolidated suites.
A third option
Both Majestic and OnCrawlare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.
Other comparisons in this space
Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Majestic or OnCrawl?
Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Majestic and OnCrawl are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Majestic for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.
How much do Majestic and OnCrawl cost?
Majestic starts at $50/mo. OnCrawl starts at Custom. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.
Which AI platforms do Majestic and OnCrawl cover?
Majestic covers 1 AI platforms. OnCrawl covers an undisclosed number of. Most tools in this space monitor ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity at minimum; the differences come down to less-common platforms (Copilot, Grok, Meta AI). GrowthManager.ai monitors the same four primary platforms and acts on the data.
Do Majestic and OnCrawl actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?
Both Majestic and OnCrawl are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.
What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Majestic and OnCrawl?
GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.
Further reading
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
- Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
- Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
- Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
- Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
- Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
Disclosure + methodology
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.