Pick
Majestic
Pick Majestic if you want the cheaper option ($50/mo vs $49/mo); and you need broader AI platform coverage (1 platforms vs 0).
Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026
Majestic vs Mention: which one wins in 2026?
Majestic and Mention both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Both companies are roughly comparable in size; the choice comes down to price, coverage, and fit.
Mention is cheaper out the gate, but Majestic tracks more AI platforms. The right pick depends on which dimension matters most for you.
The verdict
Pick
Mention
Pick Mention if you want the cheaper option ($49/mo vs $50/mo).
If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.
The case for Majestic
Founded by Alex Chudnovsky, based in Birmingham, UK. They cover 1 AI platforms. Pricing starts at $50/mo.
Backlink index and link intelligence platform with Trust Flow and Citation Flow.
What people praise
- One of the largest historical backlink indexes on the market, dating to 2008
- Proprietary Trust Flow and Citation Flow metrics are widely cited by SEO professionals
- Fresh Index is updated daily, useful for tracking newly acquired or lost links
- Clique Hunter finds sites linking to multiple competitors at once, surfaces link gap opportunities
Where it falls short
- Interface feels dated compared to Ahrefs and Semrush, often described as slow to load
- Single-purpose tool, no keyword research, rank tracking, on-page SEO, technical audits, or AI content guidance
- Lite tier locks Historic Index behind Pro, limits backlink history research
- API tier at $399.99 is steep for teams that just want bulk data exports
The case for Mention
Founded by Edouard Reinach, based in Paris, France. Pricing starts at $49/mo.
Real-time media monitoring and social listening for brands and PR teams.
What people praise
- Coverage spans 1B+ sources including Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, TikTok, Pinterest, and YouTube plus 75+ review sites like Google, Trustpilot, and Amazon.
- Boolean search operators and advanced filtering let teams cut signal from noise in ways the cheaper alternatives like Brand24 cannot match.
- Spike Alerts catch unusual mention volume early so PR teams can respond to crises within minutes, not hours.
- Historical data goes back up to two years before project creation, useful when retroactively benchmarking a campaign.
Where it falls short
- Self-serve Solo, Pro, and Pro Plus tiers were discontinued in July 2025, leaving Company at $599/mo as the only option for new customers.
- Publishing and social engagement features were retired in January 2026, with users redirected to Agorapulse, which doubled the tool stack for many teams.
- Trustpilot reviews flag slow and unhelpful customer support, especially around billing disputes.
- The $599/mo Company plan requires annual commitment with no monthly option, which excludes solopreneurs and small agencies.
Pricing, tier by tier
Tier 1
Majestic
Lite
$49.99/mo
- Fresh Index access
- Site Explorer (limited)
- 5 million Analysis Units
- Trust Flow and Citation Flow metrics
Mention
Solo (legacy)
$49/mo
- Basic real-time monitoring
- Limited keyword alerts
- Single user
Tier 2
Majestic
Pro
$99.99/mo
- Historic Index access
- Full Site Explorer
- 20 million Analysis Units
- Clique Hunter
Mention
Pro (legacy)
$99/mo
- Boolean search
- More keyword alerts
- Sentiment analysis
- Multi-user
Tier 3
Majestic
API
$399.99/mo
- Everything in Pro
- Full API access for custom dashboards
- OpenApps integrations
- Largest data extracts
Mention
Pro Plus (legacy)
$179/mo
- Higher keyword and alert limits
- Share of Voice reporting
- Competitor benchmarking
- Multi-user collaboration
Tier 4
Majestic
—
—
Mention
Company
$599/mo
- Real-time monitoring across 1B+ sources
- Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, TikTok, Pinterest, YouTube coverage
- Review monitoring across 75+ platforms including Google, Trustpilot, Amazon
- Advanced Boolean search
Feature parity
What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.
Only on Majestic
- Fresh Index. Daily-updated backlink index used for tracking recent link activity
- Historic Index. Long-tail historical backlink database with data back to 2008
- Trust Flow. Proprietary metric scoring the trustworthiness of links based on connection to seed trusted sites
- Citation Flow. Proprietary metric measuring the quantity-based influence of a URL or domain
- Site Explorer. Backlink profile view with referring domains, anchor text, and link context
- Clique Hunter. Identifies domains that link to multiple competitors but not to you
Only on Mention
- Real-Time Mention Monitoring. Streams mentions from 1B+ sources across web, news, blogs, and social platforms as they happen.
- Boolean Search Builder. Advanced query syntax for keyword combinations, exclusions, country and language filters.
- Sentiment Analysis. Auto-classifies mentions as positive, negative, or neutral with manual override.
- Spike Alerts. Detects sudden mention volume increases and notifies the team for crisis response or trend capture.
- Share of Voice Reporting. Benchmarks brand mention share against named competitors with custom dashboards and 100+ metrics.
- Review Site Monitoring. Pulls reviews from 75+ platforms including Google, Trustpilot, Amazon, and TripAdvisor into a single feed.
When each one wins
When Majestic wins
- Platform coverage matters. Majestic monitors 1 AI platforms; Mention covers 0.
- One of the largest historical backlink indexes on the market, dating to 2008
When Mention wins
- Budget is the constraint. Mention starts at $49/mo vs Majestic's $50/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
- Coverage spans 1B+ sources including Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, TikTok, Pinterest, and YouTube plus 75+ review sites like Google, Trustpilot, and Amazon.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
- You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
- You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Majestic plus an agency.
- You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
- You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.
Reasons to pick one over the other
Reasons to pick Majestic over Mention
- Broader AI platform coverage. Majestic tracks visibility across 1 AI engines vs Mention's 0.
- More mature platform. Majestic (founded 2004) has had more time to harden the product than Mention (2012).
- What users praise most. One of the largest historical backlink indexes on the market, dating to 2008
Reasons to pick Mention over Majestic
- Lower entry price. Mention starts at $49/mo vs Majestic's $50/mo.
- More plan flexibility. Mention offers 4 pricing tiers vs Majestic's 3, so there's a better chance one fits your team size.
- Faster product velocity. Mention has shipped 6 public launches in the last year vs Majestic's 0.
- Built for the LLM era. Mention was founded in 2012, built around AI search from day one; Majestic dates back to 2004 and is retrofitting.
- Wider integration ecosystem. Mention integrates with 11 tools; Majestic ships 4.
- What users praise most. Coverage spans 1B+ sources including Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, TikTok, Pinterest, and YouTube plus 75+ review sites like Google, Trustpilot, and Amazon.
Switching from one to the other
From Majestic to Mention
Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Majestic (most tools support CSV export). Most Mention setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate Mention's data againstMajestic's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Majestic. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.
From Mention to Majestic
Same flow in reverse. Export from Mention, import to Majestic. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.
From either to GrowthManager.ai
We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.
Side by side, every number we could verify
| Majestic | Mention | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at (USD/mo) | $50/mo | $49/mo |
| Founded | 2004 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Birmingham, UK | Paris, France |
| Funding raised | — | — |
| AI platforms tracked | 1 | — |
| G2 rating | — | — |
| Named customers | — | — |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | — | — |
| GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| HIPAA | — | — |
What real users say
Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.
Majestic — what users praise
- One of the largest historical backlink indexes on the market, dating to 2008
- Proprietary Trust Flow and Citation Flow metrics are widely cited by SEO professionals
- Fresh Index is updated daily, useful for tracking newly acquired or lost links
- Clique Hunter finds sites linking to multiple competitors at once, surfaces link gap opportunities
- Bulk Backlink Checker handles large URL lists for agency-scale audits
Majestic — what users complain about
- Interface feels dated compared to Ahrefs and Semrush, often described as slow to load
- Single-purpose tool, no keyword research, rank tracking, on-page SEO, technical audits, or AI content guidance
- Lite tier locks Historic Index behind Pro, limits backlink history research
- API tier at $399.99 is steep for teams that just want bulk data exports
- No native Looker Studio connector, integration requires third-party tools
Mention — what users praise
- Coverage spans 1B+ sources including Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, TikTok, Pinterest, and YouTube plus 75+ review sites like Google, Trustpilot, and Amazon.
- Boolean search operators and advanced filtering let teams cut signal from noise in ways the cheaper alternatives like Brand24 cannot match.
- Spike Alerts catch unusual mention volume early so PR teams can respond to crises within minutes, not hours.
- Historical data goes back up to two years before project creation, useful when retroactively benchmarking a campaign.
- Real-time monitoring feed pulls new mentions in as they happen, which reviewers consistently call out as best-in-class.
Mention — what users complain about
- Self-serve Solo, Pro, and Pro Plus tiers were discontinued in July 2025, leaving Company at $599/mo as the only option for new customers.
- Publishing and social engagement features were retired in January 2026, with users redirected to Agorapulse, which doubled the tool stack for many teams.
- Trustpilot reviews flag slow and unhelpful customer support, especially around billing disputes.
- The $599/mo Company plan requires annual commitment with no monthly option, which excludes solopreneurs and small agencies.
- Reviewers warn that mentions can be missed if Boolean searches are not configured carefully - the tool is powerful but not plug-and-play.
A third option
Both Majestic and Mentionare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.
Other comparisons in this space
Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Majestic or Mention?
Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Majestic and Mention are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Mention for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.
How much do Majestic and Mention cost?
Majestic starts at $50/mo. Mention starts at $49/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.
Which AI platforms do Majestic and Mention cover?
Majestic covers 1 AI platforms. Mention covers an undisclosed number of. Most tools in this space monitor ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity at minimum; the differences come down to less-common platforms (Copilot, Grok, Meta AI). GrowthManager.ai monitors the same four primary platforms and acts on the data.
Do Majestic and Mention actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?
Both Majestic and Mention are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.
What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Majestic and Mention?
GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.
Further reading
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
- Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
- Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
- Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
- Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
- Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
Disclosure + methodology
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.