★ Our pick
Pick
Lumar
Pick Lumar if you trust traction signals — they list 7 customers, Yoast SEO lists 0; and you want the better-funded company ($37.6M); and SOC 2 Type 2 matters for your security review.
Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026
Lumar vs Yoast SEO: which one wins in 2026?
Lumar and Yoast SEO both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Lumar has raised $37.6M, Yoast SEO has raised Bootstrapped; acquired by Newfold Digital; Lumar is the more-funded incumbent; Yoast SEO is the leaner challenger.
The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.
The verdict
Pick
Yoast SEO
Yoast SEO is the right pick if your team prefers their approach and pricing fits.
If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.
The case for Lumar
Lumar has raised $37.6M (Series B (Aug 2022)). Founded by Michal Magdziarz, Matt Jones, based in London, UK. On their site they list 7 named customers including Adobe, Deloitte, Motley Fool, Comcast. Pricing starts at Custom.
Enterprise website intelligence platform (formerly DeepCrawl).
What people praise
- Handles very large sites (millions of URLs) where desktop crawlers like Screaming Frog hit resource limits
- Renders JavaScript pages to capture client-side content, critical for modern stacks
- Protect app runs SEO QA in CI/CD pipelines to catch noindex or blocked resource regressions before launch
- Visual dashboards are clearer than Excel exports from competing crawlers and prioritize fixes by impact
Where it falls short
- Pricing is entirely custom, no public tiers, and reviewers consistently call it expensive vs competitors
- Steep learning curve, the UI is described as overwhelming and very technical for non-SEO users
- No competitor data inside the product, you cannot benchmark against rival domains
- Crawls can be slow on very large sites because of the depth of analysis
The case for Yoast SEO
Yoast SEO has raised Bootstrapped; acquired by Newfold Digital (Acquired by Newfold Digital (August 2021, undisclosed amount)). Founded by Joost de Valk, Marieke van de Rakt, based in Wijchen, Netherlands. Pricing starts at $0/mo.
Most-installed WordPress SEO plugin with content analysis and schema.
What people praise
- Free tier alone covers everything most WordPress sites need for technical on-page SEO, including sitemaps, schema and canonical tags.
- Real-time readability and SEO traffic-light feedback inside the WordPress editor makes optimization accessible to non-technical authors.
- Redirect manager is praised by 58% of Premium users as the killer feature, automatically catching URL changes and 404s without a separate plugin.
- Internal linking suggestion tool surfaces relevant existing posts to link to as you write, improving site structure.
Where it falls short
- Premium is licensed per site, so agencies managing many client sites pay $118.80 per install versus Rank Math's unlimited-sites pricing.
- Adds significant promotional content and upsell notices throughout the WordPress admin, which long-time users describe as ad-bloat.
- Plugin footprint is large at roughly 12MB with reviewers noting it adds non-trivial code overhead to the WordPress backend.
- Many Premium features like multi-keyword optimization are matched by free alternatives such as Rank Math.
Pricing, tier by tier
Tier 1
Lumar
Custom (modular)
Custom
- Lumar Analyze, Monitor, Protect and Impact apps available individually
- Technical SEO, GEO/AEO, site speed, accessibility and custom analytics metrics
- Pricing scales with URL volume crawled (estimated $2,667/mo for 5M URLs)
- Professional services and enterprise support
Yoast SEO
Free
$0/mo
- On-page SEO analysis and readability checks
- XML sitemaps and canonical URL settings
- Basic schema markup
- Open Graph and Twitter card tags
Tier 2
Lumar
—
—
Yoast SEO
Premium
$9.90/mo
- Multiple keyword optimization (up to 5 per page)
- Redirect manager for URL changes and 404s
- Internal linking suggestions and orphan content finder
- AI-generated meta titles and descriptions
Tier 3
Lumar
—
—
Yoast SEO
WooCommerce SEO Bundle
$14.90/mo
- Everything in Premium
- WooCommerce SEO plugin
- Product schema for richer Google shopping results
- Internal linking for product pages
Tier 4
Lumar
—
—
Yoast SEO
AI+ (Brand Monitoring)
$29.90/mo
- Everything in WooCommerce SEO bundle
- Brand monitoring across AI search engines
- Advanced AI content suggestions
- Priority feature access
Feature parity
What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.
Only on Lumar
- Analyze. Crawls websites at scale with 250+ built-in reports plus custom data extraction
- Monitor. Continuous tracking across multiple domains with customizable dashboards and threshold alerts
- Protect. Automated SEO QA tests wired into CI/CD pipelines, catches regressions pre-launch
- Impact. Stakeholder reporting with industry benchmarking and commercial impact prioritization
- GEO/AEO metrics. Tracks how AI search engines surface and cite your site
- WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits. Levels A, AA and AAA compliance checking integrated into the crawl
Only on Yoast SEO
- SEO Analysis. Real-time traffic-light scoring of focus keyphrase usage, meta tags, headings, links and image alt text inside the WordPress editor.
- Readability Analysis. Flagging of passive voice, sentence length, transition words and Flesch reading ease to keep copy accessible.
- Redirect Manager. Automatically captures URL changes, fixes 404s and supports regex-based bulk redirects without server config.
- Internal Linking. Suggests relevant existing posts to link from new content and surfaces orphan pages with no incoming links.
- AI Title and Meta Generator. Generates SEO titles and meta descriptions for posts, pages, categories and tags with one click.
- Schema Markup. Automated JSON-LD output for Organization, Article, FAQ, How-To and breadcrumb schema.
When each one wins
When Lumar wins
- You're enterprise and need to call a reference. Lumar lists 7 named customers; Yoast SEO lists 0.
- You want the better-funded incumbent. Lumar has raised $37.6M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity.
- Procurement requires SOC 2 Type 2. Lumar has it; Yoast SEO doesn't yet.
When Yoast SEO wins
- Budget is the constraint. Yoast SEO starts at $0/mo vs Lumar's $∞/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
- Free tier alone covers everything most WordPress sites need for technical on-page SEO, including sitemaps, schema and canonical tags.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
- You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
- You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Lumar plus an agency.
- You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
- You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.
Reasons to pick one over the other
Reasons to pick Lumar over Yoast SEO
- Better-funded incumbent. Lumar has raised $37.6M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity than Yoast SEO (Bootstrapped; acquired by Newfold Digital).
- More named customers. Lumar lists 7 customers vs Yoast SEO's 0, including Adobe, Deloitte, Motley Fool.
- SOC 2 Type 2. Lumar carries SOC 2 Type 2; Yoast SEO does not yet, which can hold up procurement.
- What users praise most. Handles very large sites (millions of URLs) where desktop crawlers like Screaming Frog hit resource limits
Reasons to pick Yoast SEO over Lumar
- Lower entry price. Yoast SEO publishes a clear entry tier at $0/mo; Lumar gates pricing.
- More plan flexibility. Yoast SEO offers 4 pricing tiers vs Lumar's 1, so there's a better chance one fits your team size.
- More verified reviews. Yoast SEO has 360 G2 reviews vs Lumar's 101, so the average rating carries more weight.
- What users praise most. Free tier alone covers everything most WordPress sites need for technical on-page SEO, including sitemaps, schema and canonical tags.
Switching from one to the other
From Lumar to Yoast SEO
Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Lumar (most tools support CSV export). Most Yoast SEO setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate Yoast SEO's data againstLumar's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Lumar. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.
From Yoast SEO to Lumar
Same flow in reverse. Export from Yoast SEO, import to Lumar. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.
From either to GrowthManager.ai
We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.
Side by side, every number we could verify
| Lumar | Yoast SEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at (USD/mo) | Custom | $0/mo |
| Founded | 2010 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | London, UK | Wijchen, Netherlands |
| Funding raised | $37.6M | Bootstrapped; acquired by Newfold Digital |
| AI platforms tracked | — | — |
| G2 rating | 4.6 / 5 (101 reviews) | 4.5 / 5 (360 reviews) |
| Named customers | 7 | — |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | ✓ Yes | — |
| GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| HIPAA | — | — |
What real users say
Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.
Lumar — what users praise
- Handles very large sites (millions of URLs) where desktop crawlers like Screaming Frog hit resource limits
- Renders JavaScript pages to capture client-side content, critical for modern stacks
- Protect app runs SEO QA in CI/CD pipelines to catch noindex or blocked resource regressions before launch
- Visual dashboards are clearer than Excel exports from competing crawlers and prioritize fixes by impact
- Official Looker Studio and BigQuery connectors let you blend crawl data with revenue or product data
Lumar — what users complain about
- Pricing is entirely custom, no public tiers, and reviewers consistently call it expensive vs competitors
- Steep learning curve, the UI is described as overwhelming and very technical for non-SEO users
- No competitor data inside the product, you cannot benchmark against rival domains
- Crawls can be slow on very large sites because of the depth of analysis
- Limited live chat support, most help is async or via account manager
Yoast SEO — what users praise
- Free tier alone covers everything most WordPress sites need for technical on-page SEO, including sitemaps, schema and canonical tags.
- Real-time readability and SEO traffic-light feedback inside the WordPress editor makes optimization accessible to non-technical authors.
- Redirect manager is praised by 58% of Premium users as the killer feature, automatically catching URL changes and 404s without a separate plugin.
- Internal linking suggestion tool surfaces relevant existing posts to link to as you write, improving site structure.
- Premium now bundles Local SEO, Video SEO and News SEO plugins that previously cost $79 each per year.
Yoast SEO — what users complain about
- Premium is licensed per site, so agencies managing many client sites pay $118.80 per install versus Rank Math's unlimited-sites pricing.
- Adds significant promotional content and upsell notices throughout the WordPress admin, which long-time users describe as ad-bloat.
- Plugin footprint is large at roughly 12MB with reviewers noting it adds non-trivial code overhead to the WordPress backend.
- Many Premium features like multi-keyword optimization are matched by free alternatives such as Rank Math.
- Interface has grown cluttered over the years with config wizards, Academy links and feature promotions.
A third option
Both Lumar and Yoast SEOare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.
Other comparisons in this space
Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Lumar or Yoast SEO?
Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Lumar and Yoast SEO are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Lumar for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.
How much do Lumar and Yoast SEO cost?
Lumar starts at Custom. Yoast SEO starts at $0/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.
Do Lumar and Yoast SEO actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?
Both Lumar and Yoast SEO are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.
What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Lumar and Yoast SEO?
GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.
Further reading
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
- Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
- Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
- Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
- Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
- Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
Disclosure + methodology
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.