Pick
Lumar
Pick Lumar if you want the better-funded company ($37.6M); and SOC 2 Type 2 matters for your security review.
Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026
Lumar vs SISTRIX: which one wins in 2026?
Lumar and SISTRIX both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Lumar has raised $37.6M, SISTRIX has raised Bootstrapped; Lumar is the more-funded incumbent; SISTRIX is the leaner challenger.
The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.
The verdict
Pick
SISTRIX
SISTRIX is the right pick if your team prefers their approach and pricing fits.
If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.
The case for Lumar
Lumar has raised $37.6M (Series B (Aug 2022)). Founded by Michal Magdziarz, Matt Jones, based in London, UK. On their site they list 7 named customers including Adobe, Deloitte, Motley Fool, Comcast. Pricing starts at Custom.
Enterprise website intelligence platform (formerly DeepCrawl).
What people praise
- Handles very large sites (millions of URLs) where desktop crawlers like Screaming Frog hit resource limits
- Renders JavaScript pages to capture client-side content, critical for modern stacks
- Protect app runs SEO QA in CI/CD pipelines to catch noindex or blocked resource regressions before launch
- Visual dashboards are clearer than Excel exports from competing crawlers and prioritize fixes by impact
Where it falls short
- Pricing is entirely custom, no public tiers, and reviewers consistently call it expensive vs competitors
- Steep learning curve, the UI is described as overwhelming and very technical for non-SEO users
- No competitor data inside the product, you cannot benchmark against rival domains
- Crawls can be slow on very large sites because of the depth of analysis
The case for SISTRIX
SISTRIX has raised Bootstrapped. Founded by Johannes Beus, based in Bonn, Germany. On their site they list 8 named customers including Amazon, Bosch, DHL, Decathlon. Pricing starts at $119/mo.
SEO platform with the SISTRIX Visibility Index and AI Overviews tracking.
What people praise
- The proprietary Visibility Index is an industry-standard metric in the German-speaking SEO market, calculated from rankings across 1 million keywords per country with 13+ years of historical data.
- Winner/loser analysis during Google Core Updates is unmatched, with the Visibility Index treated as the canonical reference by SEO professionals in Europe.
- Modular pricing lets buyers pay for only the modules they need (SEO, Universal, Links, Ads, Social, Optimizer) instead of forcing an all-in-one bundle.
- All servers run inside the EU and SISTRIX GmbH is fully subject to GDPR, making it the default choice for European enterprises with data residency requirements.
Where it falls short
- Data depth is heavily skewed toward DACH (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) and Western Europe; US and APAC coverage is materially weaker than Ahrefs or Semrush.
- Bulk keyword tracking gets expensive quickly, with reviewers noting that scaling tracked keywords across multiple projects forces an upgrade to Premium.
- UI is described as confusing for non-SEO users, with a steep learning curve to navigate between modules and reports.
- Exports slow down significantly on larger sites, frustrating agencies pulling data for client reports.
Pricing, tier by tier
Tier 1
Lumar
Custom (modular)
Custom
- Lumar Analyze, Monitor, Protect and Impact apps available individually
- Technical SEO, GEO/AEO, site speed, accessibility and custom analytics metrics
- Pricing scales with URL volume crawled (estimated $2,667/mo for 5M URLs)
- Professional services and enterprise support
SISTRIX
Start
€119/mo
- Visibility Index tracking
- Competitor analysis
- On-page error identification
- Single user account
Tier 2
Lumar
—
—
SISTRIX
Plus
€239/mo
- Three simultaneous user accounts
- Content marketing tools and text optimization
- API access included from Plus tier upwards
- In-person workshop
Tier 3
Lumar
—
—
SISTRIX
Professional
€419/mo
- Complete 13-year historical data
- Expanded API access
- Telephone and premium support
- Higher export and tracking limits
Tier 4
Lumar
—
—
SISTRIX
Premium
€799/mo
- Extensive export credits and keyword tracking
- Roles and rights management with audit logging
- VIP support and training program
- Suited for enterprises and large agencies
Feature parity
What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.
Only on Lumar
- Analyze. Crawls websites at scale with 250+ built-in reports plus custom data extraction
- Monitor. Continuous tracking across multiple domains with customizable dashboards and threshold alerts
- Protect. Automated SEO QA tests wired into CI/CD pipelines, catches regressions pre-launch
- Impact. Stakeholder reporting with industry benchmarking and commercial impact prioritization
- GEO/AEO metrics. Tracks how AI search engines surface and cite your site
- WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits. Levels A, AA and AAA compliance checking integrated into the crawl
Only on SISTRIX
- Visibility Index. Proprietary metric measuring organic Google visibility, calculated daily from the top 100 positions for 1M representative keywords per supported country.
- SEO Module. Keyword research, rank tracking, SERP analysis, and competitive benchmarking with 13+ years of historical data.
- Links Module. Backlink profile audit and link gap analysis against competitors.
- Optimizer. On-page audit tool that crawls websites and flags technical SEO issues.
- Ads Module. Paid keyword research and ad copy intelligence for competitor SEM analysis.
- SISTRIX for Amazon. Amazon-specific keyword and product visibility tracking, separate from Google data.
When each one wins
When Lumar wins
- You want the better-funded incumbent. Lumar has raised $37.6M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity.
- Procurement requires SOC 2 Type 2. Lumar has it; SISTRIX doesn't yet.
- Handles very large sites (millions of URLs) where desktop crawlers like Screaming Frog hit resource limits
When SISTRIX wins
- Budget is the constraint. SISTRIX starts at $119/mo vs Lumar's $∞/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
- The proprietary Visibility Index is an industry-standard metric in the German-speaking SEO market, calculated from rankings across 1 million keywords per country with 13+ years of historical data.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
- You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
- You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Lumar plus an agency.
- You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
- You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.
Reasons to pick one over the other
Reasons to pick Lumar over SISTRIX
- Better-funded incumbent. Lumar has raised $37.6M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity than SISTRIX (Bootstrapped).
- SOC 2 Type 2. Lumar carries SOC 2 Type 2; SISTRIX does not yet, which can hold up procurement.
- More verified reviews. Lumar has 101 G2 reviews vs SISTRIX's 20, so the average rating carries more weight.
- What users praise most. Handles very large sites (millions of URLs) where desktop crawlers like Screaming Frog hit resource limits
Reasons to pick SISTRIX over Lumar
- Lower entry price. SISTRIX publishes a clear entry tier at $119/mo; Lumar gates pricing.
- More plan flexibility. SISTRIX offers 4 pricing tiers vs Lumar's 1, so there's a better chance one fits your team size.
- What users praise most. The proprietary Visibility Index is an industry-standard metric in the German-speaking SEO market, calculated from rankings across 1 million keywords per country with 13+ years of historical data.
Switching from one to the other
From Lumar to SISTRIX
Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Lumar (most tools support CSV export). Most SISTRIX setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate SISTRIX's data againstLumar's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Lumar. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.
From SISTRIX to Lumar
Same flow in reverse. Export from SISTRIX, import to Lumar. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.
From either to GrowthManager.ai
We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.
Side by side, every number we could verify
| Lumar | SISTRIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at (USD/mo) | Custom | $119/mo |
| Founded | 2010 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | London, UK | Bonn, Germany |
| Funding raised | $37.6M | Bootstrapped |
| AI platforms tracked | — | — |
| G2 rating | 4.6 / 5 (101 reviews) | 4.4 / 5 (20 reviews) |
| Named customers | 7 | 8 |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | ✓ Yes | — |
| GDPR | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| HIPAA | — | — |
What real users say
Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.
Lumar — what users praise
- Handles very large sites (millions of URLs) where desktop crawlers like Screaming Frog hit resource limits
- Renders JavaScript pages to capture client-side content, critical for modern stacks
- Protect app runs SEO QA in CI/CD pipelines to catch noindex or blocked resource regressions before launch
- Visual dashboards are clearer than Excel exports from competing crawlers and prioritize fixes by impact
- Official Looker Studio and BigQuery connectors let you blend crawl data with revenue or product data
Lumar — what users complain about
- Pricing is entirely custom, no public tiers, and reviewers consistently call it expensive vs competitors
- Steep learning curve, the UI is described as overwhelming and very technical for non-SEO users
- No competitor data inside the product, you cannot benchmark against rival domains
- Crawls can be slow on very large sites because of the depth of analysis
- Limited live chat support, most help is async or via account manager
SISTRIX — what users praise
- The proprietary Visibility Index is an industry-standard metric in the German-speaking SEO market, calculated from rankings across 1 million keywords per country with 13+ years of historical data.
- Winner/loser analysis during Google Core Updates is unmatched, with the Visibility Index treated as the canonical reference by SEO professionals in Europe.
- Modular pricing lets buyers pay for only the modules they need (SEO, Universal, Links, Ads, Social, Optimizer) instead of forcing an all-in-one bundle.
- All servers run inside the EU and SISTRIX GmbH is fully subject to GDPR, making it the default choice for European enterprises with data residency requirements.
- Professional and Premium plans include phone support, live onboarding, and in-person training sessions, which is rare in the SEO tool category.
SISTRIX — what users complain about
- Data depth is heavily skewed toward DACH (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) and Western Europe; US and APAC coverage is materially weaker than Ahrefs or Semrush.
- Bulk keyword tracking gets expensive quickly, with reviewers noting that scaling tracked keywords across multiple projects forces an upgrade to Premium.
- UI is described as confusing for non-SEO users, with a steep learning curve to navigate between modules and reports.
- Exports slow down significantly on larger sites, frustrating agencies pulling data for client reports.
- Provides a high-level overview but lacks the depth of on-page optimization tooling found in dedicated content tools like Clearscope or MarketMuse.
A third option
Both Lumar and SISTRIXare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.
Other comparisons in this space
Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Lumar or SISTRIX?
Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Lumar and SISTRIX are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Lumar for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.
How much do Lumar and SISTRIX cost?
Lumar starts at Custom. SISTRIX starts at $119/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.
Do Lumar and SISTRIX actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?
Both Lumar and SISTRIX are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.
What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Lumar and SISTRIX?
GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.
Further reading
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
- Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
- Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
- Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
- Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
- Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
Disclosure + methodology
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.