Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026

Linkup vs Screaming Frog: which one wins in 2026?

Linkup and Screaming Frog both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Linkup has raised $13.2M, Screaming Frog has raised Bootstrapped; Linkup is the more-funded incumbent; Screaming Frog is the leaner challenger.

The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.

The verdict
★ Our pick
Pick

Linkup

Pick Linkup if you trust traction signals — they list 8 customers, Screaming Frog lists 0; and you want the better-funded company ($13.2M); and SOC 2 Type 2 matters for your security review.

Pick

Screaming Frog

Screaming Frog is the right pick if your team prefers their approach and pricing fits.

If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.

The case for Linkup

Linkup has raised $13.2M ($10M Seed (Feb 2026, led by Gradient)). Founded by Philippe Mizrahi, Denis Charrier, Boris Toledano, based in Paris, France. On their site they list 8 named customers including McKinsey & Company, Cohere, KPMG, EY. Pricing starts at $0/mo.

Search API used by AI agents — the data layer for retrieval-augmented LLM apps.

What people praise

  • Built specifically as an API for AI agents and LLMs, not retrofitted from a consumer search product
  • Licenses content from publishers and pays them on usage, so results are legal and citation-safe
  • Sub-second search latency is fast enough for real-time agent tool calls
  • Free tier ships 4,000 queries and startups can apply for $5,000 in credits

Where it falls short

  • Per-request pricing makes monthly cost hard to forecast for high-volume agents
  • Deep Research mode can cost up to $2.50 per call, expensive at scale
  • Not a visibility, SEO or content product, it is a raw search API and you build the workflow yourself
  • No G2 or Capterra reviews yet, the company only launched its API in late 2024

The case for Screaming Frog

Screaming Frog has raised Bootstrapped. Founded by Dan Sharp, based in Henley-in-Arden, UK. Pricing starts at $0/mo.

Desktop SEO crawler used by technical SEOs everywhere.

What people praise

  • Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.
  • Comprehensive technical audit catches broken links, redirect chains, duplicate content, missing canonicals, and metadata errors in one pass.
  • Custom extraction with XPath and CSS selectors is repeatedly cited as the killer feature for scraping data no other crawler can pull.
  • Recent integrations with OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini let users run prompts against scraped content during a crawl.

Where it falls short

  • Desktop-only Java app, so reviewers complain there is no cloud dashboard and no way to share live crawl data with teammates.
  • Heavy memory footprint, with users reporting that large sites (1M+ URLs) require 32GB RAM and database storage mode.
  • UI looks dated and the learning curve is steep for non-technical users, especially around XPath extraction.
  • No keyword research, backlink analysis, or rank tracking, so users still need a second tool for those workflows.

Pricing, tier by tier

Tier 1
Linkup
Fetch
$0.001 - $0.005 per request
  • URL content extraction
  • Sub-2 second latency, synchronous
  • 4,000 complimentary queries for new accounts
Screaming Frog
Free
$0
  • Crawl up to 500 URLs per run
  • Broken link and error detection
  • Meta data analysis
  • XML sitemap generation
Tier 2
Linkup
Search
$0.005 - $0.006 per request
  • Web search tool calls for AI agents
  • Fast, Standard and Deep variants
  • 1-3 second synchronous latency
  • Sourced, cited answers with full-text snippets
Screaming Frog
Paid License
~$21/mo
  • Unlimited URL crawl (memory permitting)
  • JavaScript rendering and mobile usability audits
  • Structured data validation
  • AI integrations with OpenAI, Gemini, and Anthropic Claude
Tier 3
Linkup
Research
$0.25 - $2.50 per request
  • Asynchronous deep research over the web
  • 1-10 minute latency
  • Multi-step reasoning with citations
Screaming Frog
Volume Discount (5-9 seats)
~$20/mo
  • All paid license features
  • Discounted bulk seats for agencies
Tier 4
Linkup
Enterprise
Custom
  • Personalized indexes
  • Dedicated index refresh rates
  • Private environments and bring-your-own-cloud
  • IP whitelisting, ZDR, SOC 2 Type II, SLA
Screaming Frog
Volume Discount (20+ seats)
~$18/mo
  • All paid license features
  • Best per-seat rate for large teams

Feature parity

What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.

Only on Linkup
  • Fetch API. Synchronous URL content extraction in under 2 seconds, returns clean markdown
  • Search API. Web search tool calls with sourced, cited answers and full-text snippets in 1-3 seconds
  • Research API. Asynchronous deep research that runs multi-step reasoning over the web and returns a cited report
  • Tunable index. Filter by source allowlist, freshness window and content type
  • Private index. Deploy Linkup over your own proprietary documents
  • Bring Your Own Cloud. Run the Linkup runtime inside your own AWS, GCP or Azure account
Only on Screaming Frog
  • Website Crawler. Breadth-first crawler that fetches URLs, response codes, redirects, page titles, meta descriptions, headings, and content.
  • Custom Extraction. Pull any data from a page using XPath, CSS selectors, or regex during the crawl.
  • JavaScript Rendering. Renders pages with a headless Chromium engine to crawl single-page apps and JS-heavy sites.
  • Crawl Comparison. Diffs two crawls to surface changes in metadata, response codes, structure, and content between deploys.
  • AI Prompt Integration. Run prompts against OpenAI, Claude, or Gemini for every URL during a crawl, for example to classify pages or generate alt text.
  • Structured Data Validation. Audits JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFa against Google and Schema.org specs.

When each one wins

When Linkup wins
  • You're enterprise and need to call a reference. Linkup lists 8 named customers; Screaming Frog lists 0.
  • You want the better-funded incumbent. Linkup has raised $13.2M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity.
  • Procurement requires SOC 2 Type 2. Linkup has it; Screaming Frog doesn't yet.
When Screaming Frog wins
  • Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
  • You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
  • You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Linkup plus an agency.
  • You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
  • You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.

Reasons to pick one over the other

Reasons to pick Linkup over Screaming Frog

  1. Better-funded incumbent. Linkup has raised $13.2M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity than Screaming Frog (Bootstrapped).
  2. More named customers. Linkup lists 8 customers vs Screaming Frog's 0, including McKinsey & Company, Cohere, KPMG.
  3. SOC 2 Type 2. Linkup carries SOC 2 Type 2; Screaming Frog does not yet, which can hold up procurement.
  4. Built for the LLM era. Linkup was founded in 2024, built around AI search from day one; Screaming Frog dates back to 2010 and is retrofitting.
  5. What users praise most. Built specifically as an API for AI agents and LLMs, not retrofitted from a consumer search product

Reasons to pick Screaming Frog over Linkup

  1. More verified reviews. Screaming Frog has 186 G2 reviews vs Linkup's none on file, so the average rating carries more weight.
  2. Faster product velocity. Screaming Frog has shipped 4 public launches in the last year vs Linkup's 0.
  3. More mature platform. Screaming Frog (founded 2010) has had more time to harden the product than Linkup (2024).
  4. What users praise most. Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.

Switching from one to the other

From Linkup to Screaming Frog

Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Linkup (most tools support CSV export). Most Screaming Frog setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate Screaming Frog's data againstLinkup's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Linkup. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.

From Screaming Frog to Linkup

Same flow in reverse. Export from Screaming Frog, import to Linkup. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.

From either to GrowthManager.ai

We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.

Side by side, every number we could verify

LinkupScreaming Frog
Starts at (USD/mo)$0/mo$0/mo
Founded20242010
HeadquartersParis, FranceHenley-in-Arden, UK
Funding raised$13.2MBootstrapped
AI platforms tracked
G2 rating4.7 / 5 (186 reviews)
Named customers8
SOC 2 Type 2✓ Yes
GDPR✓ Yes✓ Yes
HIPAA

What real users say

Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.

Linkupwhat users praise

  • Built specifically as an API for AI agents and LLMs, not retrofitted from a consumer search product
  • Licenses content from publishers and pays them on usage, so results are legal and citation-safe
  • Sub-second search latency is fast enough for real-time agent tool calls
  • Free tier ships 4,000 queries and startups can apply for $5,000 in credits
  • SOC 2 Type II and ZDR are included at no additional cost on every plan

Linkupwhat users complain about

  • Per-request pricing makes monthly cost hard to forecast for high-volume agents
  • Deep Research mode can cost up to $2.50 per call, expensive at scale
  • Not a visibility, SEO or content product, it is a raw search API and you build the workflow yourself
  • No G2 or Capterra reviews yet, the company only launched its API in late 2024
  • Index is still smaller than incumbents like Google or Bing, niche queries can return thin results

Screaming Frogwhat users praise

  • Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.
  • Comprehensive technical audit catches broken links, redirect chains, duplicate content, missing canonicals, and metadata errors in one pass.
  • Custom extraction with XPath and CSS selectors is repeatedly cited as the killer feature for scraping data no other crawler can pull.
  • Recent integrations with OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini let users run prompts against scraped content during a crawl.
  • One-time low annual fee ($21/mo equivalent) is dramatically cheaper than Semrush or Ahrefs site audits.

Screaming Frogwhat users complain about

  • Desktop-only Java app, so reviewers complain there is no cloud dashboard and no way to share live crawl data with teammates.
  • Heavy memory footprint, with users reporting that large sites (1M+ URLs) require 32GB RAM and database storage mode.
  • UI looks dated and the learning curve is steep for non-technical users, especially around XPath extraction.
  • No keyword research, backlink analysis, or rank tracking, so users still need a second tool for those workflows.
  • No collaboration features, so two SEOs cannot work on the same crawl results without exporting CSVs.

A third option

Both Linkup and Screaming Frogare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Linkup or Screaming Frog?

Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Linkup and Screaming Frog are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Linkup for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.

How much do Linkup and Screaming Frog cost?

Linkup starts at $0/mo. Screaming Frog starts at $0/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.

Do Linkup and Screaming Frog actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?

Both Linkup and Screaming Frog are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.

What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Linkup and Screaming Frog?

GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.

Further reading

External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.

  1. Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft

    How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.

  2. Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig

    Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.

  3. Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner

    Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.

  4. Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro

    Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.

  5. Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman

    The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.

Disclosure + methodology

GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.