Pick
Keyword Tool
Pick Keyword Tool if you want the cheaper option ($0/mo vs $39/mo).
Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026
Keyword Tool vs Moz: which one wins in 2026?
Keyword Tool and Moz both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Keyword Tool has raised Bootstrapped, Moz has raised $29.1M before acquisition: $1.1M Series A (2007, Ignition Partners and Curious Office), $18M Series B (2012, Foundry Group and Ignition Partners), plus growth funding; Moz is the more-funded incumbent; Keyword Tool is the leaner challenger.
Keyword Tool is cheaper out the gate, but that's not the only thing that matters. The right pick depends on which dimension matters most for you.
The verdict
Pick
Moz
Pick Moz if you want the cheaper option ($39/mo vs $0/mo); and you want the better-funded company ($29.1M before acquisition: $1.1M Series A (2007, Ignition Partners and Curious Office), $18M Series B (2012, Foundry Group and Ignition Partners), plus growth funding).
If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.
The case for Keyword Tool
Keyword Tool has raised Bootstrapped. Founded by Artem Galimov, Leow Kah Thong, based in Hong Kong. Pricing starts at $0/mo.
Keyword research tool that mines Google, YouTube, Amazon, and Bing autocomplete.
What people praise
- YouTube keyword research is genuinely useful for video creators, surfaces autosuggest queries Google Keyword Planner ignores
- Amazon module helps ecommerce sellers find purchase-intent terms with high CPC visibility
- 15 platforms covered including YouTube, Bing, Amazon, eBay, App Store, Play Store, Instagram, X, Pinterest, Etsy, TikTok
- 750+ long-tail suggestions per query, more breadth than most free keyword tools
Where it falls short
- Free version hides search volume, CPC, and trend data, the upgrade pressure is the core complaint
- Search volume accuracy is inconsistent compared to Semrush and Ahrefs, problematic for business decisions
- No competitive analysis feature, you learn what people search but not whether you can rank for it
- Reports of difficulty getting refunds despite the advertised 30-day money-back guarantee
The case for Moz
Moz has raised $29.1M before acquisition: $1.1M Series A (2007, Ignition Partners and Curious Office), $18M Series B (2012, Foundry Group and Ignition Partners), plus growth funding (Acquired by iContact Marketing (J2 Global/Ziff Davis) in 2021). Founded by Rand Fishkin, Gillian Muessig, based in Seattle, WA. Pricing starts at $39/mo.
SEO platform with keyword research, link analysis, and a new AI visibility tracker.
What people praise
- Domain Authority is the SEO industry's most widely cited link-strength metric, referenced in client reports and pitches across the entire category.
- Moz Academy and the free MozBar Chrome extension drive deep brand trust that Ahrefs and Semrush spend millions to match.
- Capterra rating sits at 4.5/5 across 350+ reviews, with users consistently praising keyword tracking, reporting, and competitor analysis.
- Page Optimization Suggestions tool gives actionable on-page recommendations that are friendlier to non-SEO teams than Ahrefs Site Audit.
Where it falls short
- Reviewers say pricing matches Ahrefs and Semrush but Moz's database depth and freshness lag both, especially on keyword volume estimates.
- Additional user seats cost $49/mo each on every plan, which agencies call a hidden cost compared to Ahrefs' bundled seats.
- Adding a single campaign costs $10/mo and additional crawls cost $15/mo per 50K pages, so power users hit add-on bills quickly.
- UX is described as dated and harder to navigate than Ahrefs or Semrush, particularly on Site Crawl and Page Grader screens.
Pricing, tier by tier
Tier 1
Keyword Tool
Free
$0/mo
- 750+ long-tail keyword suggestions per query
- No account required
- No search volume, CPC, or trend data
- Limited keyword count
Moz
Starter
$39/mo
- 1 campaign
- Basic keyword research
- Site Crawl with limited pages
- Limited rank tracking
Tier 2
Keyword Tool
Pro Basic
$89/mo
- Search volume data
- More keywords per query
- Bulk search volume analysis (up to 1,000 keywords)
- CSV and Excel export
Moz
Standard
$79/mo
- 3 campaigns
- Keyword Explorer with monthly query limit
- Site Crawl up to 100K pages
- Page Optimization Suggestions
Tier 3
Keyword Tool
Pro Plus
$99/mo
- Everything in Pro Basic
- Cost-per-click data
- Competition data
- Historical trend data
Moz
Medium
$143/mo
- 10 campaigns
- Higher keyword query limits
- Site Crawl up to 500K pages
- On-page grader
Tier 4
Keyword Tool
Pro Business
$199/mo
- Everything in Pro Plus
- API access (50 requests per day)
- 10 user accounts
- Priority support
Moz
Large
$239/mo
- 25 campaigns
- Highest keyword research limits
- Site Crawl up to 2M pages
- Higher rank tracking limits
Feature parity
What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.
Only on Keyword Tool
- Multi-platform keyword research. Autosuggest scraping across 15 platforms including Google, YouTube, Bing, Amazon, eBay, App Store, Play Store, Pinterest, TikTok
- Bulk search volume analyzer. Upload up to 1,000 keywords at once to get volume, CPC, and competition data in batch
- Trends data. Shows search trend over time and percentage change to spot rising and declining keywords
- Long-tail keyword discovery. Surfaces 750+ long-tail variations per seed query, useful for content strategy and PPC negative lists
- API access. Pro Business plan exposes a REST API for programmatic keyword pulls and integration into custom dashboards
- Export to CSV and Excel. All paid tiers support flat file exports for offline analysis and client reporting
Only on Moz
- Domain Authority. Proprietary 0-100 score predicting a domain's likelihood of ranking, used as a benchmark across the SEO industry.
- Keyword Explorer. Search volume, difficulty, organic CTR, and SERP analysis for keyword research and prioritization.
- Site Crawl. Cloud crawler that audits technical SEO issues and tracks them over time across campaigns.
- Rank Tracker. Daily and weekly position tracking across desktop and mobile, with STAT-powered enterprise tracking on higher tiers.
- Link Explorer. Backlink index for prospecting, lost-link recovery, and competitor link gap analysis.
- MozBar. Free Chrome extension surfacing DA, PA, link metrics, and on-page elements while browsing the web.
When each one wins
When Keyword Tool wins
- Budget is the constraint. Keyword Tool starts at $0/mo vs Moz's $39/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
- YouTube keyword research is genuinely useful for video creators, surfaces autosuggest queries Google Keyword Planner ignores
When Moz wins
- You want the better-funded incumbent. Moz has raised $29.1M before acquisition: $1.1M Series A (2007, Ignition Partners and Curious Office), $18M Series B (2012, Foundry Group and Ignition Partners), plus growth funding, giving it more runway and shipping velocity.
- Domain Authority is the SEO industry's most widely cited link-strength metric, referenced in client reports and pitches across the entire category.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
- You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
- You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Keyword Tool plus an agency.
- You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
- You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.
Reasons to pick one over the other
Reasons to pick Keyword Tool over Moz
- Lower entry price. Keyword Tool starts at $0/mo vs Moz's $39/mo.
- Built for the LLM era. Keyword Tool was founded in 2014, built around AI search from day one; Moz dates back to 2004 and is retrofitting.
- What users praise most. YouTube keyword research is genuinely useful for video creators, surfaces autosuggest queries Google Keyword Planner ignores
Reasons to pick Moz over Keyword Tool
- Better-funded incumbent. Moz has raised $29.1M before acquisition: $1.1M Series A (2007, Ignition Partners and Curious Office), $18M Series B (2012, Foundry Group and Ignition Partners), plus growth funding, giving it more runway and shipping velocity than Keyword Tool (Bootstrapped).
- More verified reviews. Moz has 569 G2 reviews vs Keyword Tool's 19, so the average rating carries more weight.
- Faster product velocity. Moz has shipped 4 public launches in the last year vs Keyword Tool's 0.
- More mature platform. Moz (founded 2004) has had more time to harden the product than Keyword Tool (2014).
- What users praise most. Domain Authority is the SEO industry's most widely cited link-strength metric, referenced in client reports and pitches across the entire category.
Switching from one to the other
From Keyword Tool to Moz
Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Keyword Tool (most tools support CSV export). Most Moz setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate Moz's data againstKeyword Tool's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Keyword Tool. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.
From Moz to Keyword Tool
Same flow in reverse. Export from Moz, import to Keyword Tool. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.
From either to GrowthManager.ai
We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.
Side by side, every number we could verify
| Keyword Tool | Moz | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at (USD/mo) | $0/mo | $39/mo |
| Founded | 2014 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Hong Kong | Seattle, WA |
| Funding raised | Bootstrapped | $29.1M before acquisition: $1.1M Series A (2007, Ignition Partners and Curious Office), $18M Series B (2012, Foundry Group and Ignition Partners), plus growth funding |
| AI platforms tracked | — | — |
| G2 rating | 4.5 / 5 (19 reviews) | 4.3 / 5 (569 reviews) |
| Named customers | — | — |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | — | — |
| GDPR | — | ✓ Yes |
| HIPAA | — | — |
What real users say
Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.
Keyword Tool — what users praise
- YouTube keyword research is genuinely useful for video creators, surfaces autosuggest queries Google Keyword Planner ignores
- Amazon module helps ecommerce sellers find purchase-intent terms with high CPC visibility
- 15 platforms covered including YouTube, Bing, Amazon, eBay, App Store, Play Store, Instagram, X, Pinterest, Etsy, TikTok
- 750+ long-tail suggestions per query, more breadth than most free keyword tools
- Beginner-friendly UI, new SEO users can pull keyword data within minutes of landing on the site
Keyword Tool — what users complain about
- Free version hides search volume, CPC, and trend data, the upgrade pressure is the core complaint
- Search volume accuracy is inconsistent compared to Semrush and Ahrefs, problematic for business decisions
- No competitive analysis feature, you learn what people search but not whether you can rank for it
- Reports of difficulty getting refunds despite the advertised 30-day money-back guarantee
- Pro plans start at $89/mo which is steep for solo creators when competitors offer broader feature sets
Moz — what users praise
- Domain Authority is the SEO industry's most widely cited link-strength metric, referenced in client reports and pitches across the entire category.
- Moz Academy and the free MozBar Chrome extension drive deep brand trust that Ahrefs and Semrush spend millions to match.
- Capterra rating sits at 4.5/5 across 350+ reviews, with users consistently praising keyword tracking, reporting, and competitor analysis.
- Page Optimization Suggestions tool gives actionable on-page recommendations that are friendlier to non-SEO teams than Ahrefs Site Audit.
- STAT Search Analytics acquisition (2018) gives enterprise customers daily SERP tracking at scale that competitors charge premium add-on fees for.
Moz — what users complain about
- Reviewers say pricing matches Ahrefs and Semrush but Moz's database depth and freshness lag both, especially on keyword volume estimates.
- Additional user seats cost $49/mo each on every plan, which agencies call a hidden cost compared to Ahrefs' bundled seats.
- Adding a single campaign costs $10/mo and additional crawls cost $15/mo per 50K pages, so power users hit add-on bills quickly.
- UX is described as dated and harder to navigate than Ahrefs or Semrush, particularly on Site Crawl and Page Grader screens.
- 2021 acquisition by iContact Marketing (J2 Global/Ziff Davis) slowed feature shipping noticeably, per longtime customers on Reddit.
A third option
Both Keyword Tool and Mozare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.
Other comparisons in this space
Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Keyword Tool or Moz?
Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Keyword Tool and Moz are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Keyword Tool for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.
How much do Keyword Tool and Moz cost?
Keyword Tool starts at $0/mo. Moz starts at $39/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.
Do Keyword Tool and Moz actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?
Both Keyword Tool and Moz are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.
What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Keyword Tool and Moz?
GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.
Further reading
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
- Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
- Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
- Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
- Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
- Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
Disclosure + methodology
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.