Pick
HyperWrite
Pick HyperWrite if you want the better-funded company ($5.8M).
Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026
HyperWrite vs OnCrawl: which one wins in 2026?
HyperWrite and OnCrawl both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. HyperWrite is the more-funded incumbent; OnCrawl is the leaner challenger.
The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.
The verdict
Pick
OnCrawl
Pick OnCrawl if you trust traction signals — they list 10 customers, HyperWrite lists 0.
If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.
The case for HyperWrite
HyperWrite has raised $5.8M ($2.8M (2023)). Founded by Matt Shumer, Jason Kuperberg, Miles Feldstein, based in New York, NY. Pricing starts at $0/mo.
Personal AI writing assistant with browser agent capabilities.
What people praise
- TypeAhead autocomplete inside Gmail, Google Docs, LinkedIn, and CRMs saves 15-20 seconds per short message
- Chrome extension extends AI writing into any web form, removes the copy-paste loop most AI writers require
- Personalized learning watches your style across sites so suggestions get sharper over time
- Hundreds of pre-built tools cover everything from academic essays to cold email scripts
Where it falls short
- Fast typists above 90 words per minute report TypeAhead suggestions arrive too slowly to be useful
- Suggestions cap at a few sentences, can interrupt flow on longer-form pieces
- Loses context on long, complex articles, reviewers say it works best on short-form
- UI is not intuitive, document settings like output length are buried under a customize menu
The case for OnCrawl
Founded by Francois Goube, Tanguy Moal, based in Bordeaux, France. On their site they list 10 named customers including Adidas, L'Oreal, Ticketmaster, Harrods.
Enterprise SEO data platform combining crawl, logs, and AI insights.
What people praise
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
- Log file analyzer processes 500M+ log lines per day, surfacing how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI crawlers actually behave on the site.
- Cross-references crawl data, server logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic backlinks in one analysis - few competitors integrate all five sources.
- 100% unsampled data analysis appeals to enterprise SEOs frustrated with GA4 sampling and Search Console limits.
Where it falls short
- No public pricing - book-a-demo gating means SMBs and indie consultants are filtered out before evaluation.
- Capterra rating of 3.8 is the lowest among major technical SEO crawlers, with reviewers citing UI complexity and pricing opacity.
- Steep learning curve - the platform assumes data-science fluency, which leaves marketers needing a technical SEO specialist to extract value.
- Self-serve onboarding is limited; complex multi-source setups (logs plus crawl plus analytics) typically need OnCrawl's customer success team.
Pricing, tier by tier
Tier 1
HyperWrite
Starter
$0/mo
- Limited monthly AI credits
- Basic writing tools
- TypeAhead autocomplete with limits
- Chrome extension access
OnCrawl
—
—
Tier 2
HyperWrite
Premium
$19.99/mo
- 250 AI messages per month
- Citations and real-time research
- 3 custom personas
- Hundreds of AI writing tools
OnCrawl
—
—
Tier 3
HyperWrite
Ultra
$44.99/mo
- Unlimited AI messages
- 10 custom personas
- First access to experimental features and agents
- Unlimited TypeAhead with Chrome extension
OnCrawl
—
—
Feature parity
What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.
Only on HyperWrite
- TypeAhead autocomplete. AI suggests next phrases and sentences as you type inside any text field on the web via Chrome extension
- Custom personas. Train HyperWrite on your tone and style to produce on-voice output for different brand audiences
- Real-time research with citations. Pulls live web sources and includes citations in generated drafts at Premium tier
- AI agents. Task agents handle multi-step workflows like booking, summarizing inboxes, and research
- Chrome extension. Brings TypeAhead, rewriting, and chat into Gmail, Google Docs, LinkedIn, and any web form
- AI Document Editor. Long-form editor with hundreds of writing templates and inline AI rewrite tools
Only on OnCrawl
- SEO Crawler. JavaScript-capable cloud crawler that audits 300M+ URLs, mapping site architecture, internal linking, and orphan pages.
- Log File Analyzer. Processes 500M+ log lines daily to show how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI bots interact with the site.
- Data3 Cross-Analysis. Combines crawl, logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic data in unified reports with custom segmentation.
- SEO Impact Report. Connects technical SEO metrics to business outcomes like organic revenue and conversions.
- REST API. Full developer API with automated crawl scheduling and log ingestion for enterprise SEO automation.
When each one wins
When HyperWrite wins
- Budget is the constraint. HyperWrite starts at $0/mo vs OnCrawl's $∞/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
- TypeAhead autocomplete inside Gmail, Google Docs, LinkedIn, and CRMs saves 15-20 seconds per short message
When OnCrawl wins
- You're enterprise and need to call a reference. OnCrawl lists 10 named customers; HyperWrite lists 0.
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
- You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
- You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking HyperWrite plus an agency.
- You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
- You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.
Reasons to pick one over the other
Reasons to pick HyperWrite over OnCrawl
- Lower entry price. HyperWrite publishes a clear entry tier at $0/mo; OnCrawl gates pricing.
- Public pricing. HyperWrite publishes 3 tiers on its website; OnCrawl requires a sales conversation.
- Better-funded incumbent. HyperWrite has raised $5.8M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity than OnCrawl.
- Higher G2 rating. HyperWrite averages 4.8/5 on G2; OnCrawl averages 4.4.
- Built for the LLM era. HyperWrite was founded in 2020, built around AI search from day one; OnCrawl dates back to 2013 and is retrofitting.
- What users praise most. TypeAhead autocomplete inside Gmail, Google Docs, LinkedIn, and CRMs saves 15-20 seconds per short message
Reasons to pick OnCrawl over HyperWrite
- More named customers. OnCrawl lists 10 customers vs HyperWrite's 0, including Adidas, L'Oreal, Ticketmaster.
- More mature platform. OnCrawl (founded 2013) has had more time to harden the product than HyperWrite (2020).
- What users praise most. JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
- EU data residency. OnCrawl is HQ'd in Bordeaux, France, which simplifies GDPR data-processor agreements for European buyers.
Switching from one to the other
From HyperWrite to OnCrawl
Export your saved queries and prompt panels from HyperWrite (most tools support CSV export). Most OnCrawl setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate OnCrawl's data againstHyperWrite's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel HyperWrite. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.
From OnCrawl to HyperWrite
Same flow in reverse. Export from OnCrawl, import to HyperWrite. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.
From either to GrowthManager.ai
We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.
Side by side, every number we could verify
| HyperWrite | OnCrawl | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at (USD/mo) | $0/mo | Custom |
| Founded | 2020 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY | Bordeaux, France |
| Funding raised | $5.8M | — |
| AI platforms tracked | — | — |
| G2 rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Named customers | — | 10 |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | — | — |
| GDPR | — | ✓ Yes |
| HIPAA | — | — |
What real users say
Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.
HyperWrite — what users praise
- TypeAhead autocomplete inside Gmail, Google Docs, LinkedIn, and CRMs saves 15-20 seconds per short message
- Chrome extension extends AI writing into any web form, removes the copy-paste loop most AI writers require
- Personalized learning watches your style across sites so suggestions get sharper over time
- Hundreds of pre-built tools cover everything from academic essays to cold email scripts
- Custom personas let teams maintain different tones for different audiences without retraining each time
HyperWrite — what users complain about
- Fast typists above 90 words per minute report TypeAhead suggestions arrive too slowly to be useful
- Suggestions cap at a few sentences, can interrupt flow on longer-form pieces
- Loses context on long, complex articles, reviewers say it works best on short-form
- UI is not intuitive, document settings like output length are buried under a customize menu
- Premium tier hard-caps at 250 messages, heavy users hit the wall and need Ultra at $45/mo
OnCrawl — what users praise
- JavaScript-capable crawler scales to 300M+ URLs per project, putting it in the same league as Botify and DeepCrawl for enterprise sites.
- Log file analyzer processes 500M+ log lines per day, surfacing how Googlebot, Bingbot, and AI crawlers actually behave on the site.
- Cross-references crawl data, server logs, GSC, GA4, Adobe Analytics, and Majestic backlinks in one analysis - few competitors integrate all five sources.
- 100% unsampled data analysis appeals to enterprise SEOs frustrated with GA4 sampling and Search Console limits.
- 30-day ROI guarantee gives risk cover for enterprise buyers piloting against incumbent BrightEdge or Conductor deployments.
OnCrawl — what users complain about
- No public pricing - book-a-demo gating means SMBs and indie consultants are filtered out before evaluation.
- Capterra rating of 3.8 is the lowest among major technical SEO crawlers, with reviewers citing UI complexity and pricing opacity.
- Steep learning curve - the platform assumes data-science fluency, which leaves marketers needing a technical SEO specialist to extract value.
- Self-serve onboarding is limited; complex multi-source setups (logs plus crawl plus analytics) typically need OnCrawl's customer success team.
- BrightEdge ownership raises long-term roadmap questions for customers who prefer best-of-breed technical SEO over consolidated suites.
A third option
Both HyperWrite and OnCrawlare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.
Other comparisons in this space
Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, HyperWrite or OnCrawl?
Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. HyperWrite and OnCrawl are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick HyperWrite for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.
How much do HyperWrite and OnCrawl cost?
HyperWrite starts at $0/mo. OnCrawl starts at Custom. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.
Do HyperWrite and OnCrawl actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?
Both HyperWrite and OnCrawl are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.
What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to HyperWrite and OnCrawl?
GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.
Further reading
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
- Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
- Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
- Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
- Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
- Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
Disclosure + methodology
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.