Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026

Goodie vs Screaming Frog: which one wins in 2026?

Goodie and Screaming Frog both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Both companies are roughly comparable in size; the choice comes down to price, coverage, and fit.

The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.

The verdict
Pick

Goodie

Pick Goodie if you need broader AI platform coverage (11 platforms vs 0).

Pick

Screaming Frog

Screaming Frog is the right pick if your team prefers their approach and pricing fits.

If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.

The case for Goodie

Founded by Mostafa ElBermawy, based in New York City, United States. They cover 11 AI platforms. Pricing starts at Custom (quote-based) with no free trial.

Goodie is an enterprise AEO platform that monitors, analyzes, and optimizes brand and product presence across 11 AI search engines including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Amazon Rufus, and more.

What people praise

  • Broadest AI engine coverage in the category (11 platforms including niche engines like Amazon Rufus, DeepSeek, Grok, and Meta AI)
  • Actionable optimization layer that closes the loop between insights and execution inside a single platform
  • Delivers measurable, defensible business outcomes — documented client results across conversions, citations, and traffic
  • User-friendly dashboard with digestible metrics accessible to both technical and non-technical marketers

Where it falls short

  • No free trial — only demos and a free AI Search Assessment, putting it at a disadvantage vs. competitors that allow self-serve evaluation
  • Premium pricing with no published rates makes ROI justification difficult for smaller or budget-constrained teams
  • Onboarding complexity and setup friction — not self-serve; requires hands-on support and operational discipline to get started
  • Rapid product roadmap velocity creates a 'moving target' effect — users must stay constantly informed of changes

The case for Screaming Frog

Screaming Frog has raised Bootstrapped. Founded by Dan Sharp, based in Henley-in-Arden, UK. Pricing starts at $0/mo.

Desktop SEO crawler used by technical SEOs everywhere.

What people praise

  • Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.
  • Comprehensive technical audit catches broken links, redirect chains, duplicate content, missing canonicals, and metadata errors in one pass.
  • Custom extraction with XPath and CSS selectors is repeatedly cited as the killer feature for scraping data no other crawler can pull.
  • Recent integrations with OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini let users run prompts against scraped content during a crawl.

Where it falls short

  • Desktop-only Java app, so reviewers complain there is no cloud dashboard and no way to share live crawl data with teammates.
  • Heavy memory footprint, with users reporting that large sites (1M+ URLs) require 32GB RAM and database storage mode.
  • UI looks dated and the learning curve is steep for non-technical users, especially around XPath extraction.
  • No keyword research, backlink analysis, or rank tracking, so users still need a second tool for those workflows.

Pricing, tier by tier

Tier 1
Goodie
Explorer
Custom (quote-based)
  • 3 seats
  • 100 prompts tracked
  • 10 optimization actions per month
  • 3 AI engines (ChatGPT, AI Overview, Perplexity)
Screaming Frog
Free
$0
  • Crawl up to 500 URLs per run
  • Broken link and error detection
  • Meta data analysis
  • XML sitemap generation
Tier 2
Goodie
Pro
Custom (quote-based)
  • 5 seats
  • 250 prompts tracked
  • 30 optimization actions per month
  • 6 AI engines (adds Gemini, Copilot, Rufus)
Screaming Frog
Paid License
~$21/mo
  • Unlimited URL crawl (memory permitting)
  • JavaScript rendering and mobile usability audits
  • Structured data validation
  • AI integrations with OpenAI, Gemini, and Anthropic Claude
Tier 3
Goodie
Enterprise
Custom (quote-based)
  • 10+ seats
  • 500+ prompts tracked
  • 60+ optimization actions per month
  • All 11 answer engines
Screaming Frog
Volume Discount (5-9 seats)
~$20/mo
  • All paid license features
  • Discounted bulk seats for agencies
Tier 4
Goodie
Screaming Frog
Volume Discount (20+ seats)
~$18/mo
  • All paid license features
  • Best per-seat rate for large teams

Feature parity

What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.

Only on Goodie
  • AI Visibility Monitoring. Tracks brand mentions, sentiment, ranking position, and top domains citing the brand across all 11 AI models. Segments performance by geography, persona, model language, and topic category. Enables competitive share-of-voice benchmarking.
  • Prompt Research. Discovers the actual customer prompts used in AI search and surfaces visibility opportunities. Helps teams identify which queries they are and are not appearing in across AI answer engines.
  • Agentic Commerce Suite. Tracks and optimizes product visibility inside AI shopping experiences on ChatGPT, Amazon Rufus, and Perplexity. A differentiating feature for e-commerce brands not commonly offered by other AEO platforms.
Only on Screaming Frog
  • Website Crawler. Breadth-first crawler that fetches URLs, response codes, redirects, page titles, meta descriptions, headings, and content.
  • Custom Extraction. Pull any data from a page using XPath, CSS selectors, or regex during the crawl.
  • JavaScript Rendering. Renders pages with a headless Chromium engine to crawl single-page apps and JS-heavy sites.
  • Crawl Comparison. Diffs two crawls to surface changes in metadata, response codes, structure, and content between deploys.
  • AI Prompt Integration. Run prompts against OpenAI, Claude, or Gemini for every URL during a crawl, for example to classify pages or generate alt text.
  • Structured Data Validation. Audits JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFa against Google and Schema.org specs.

When each one wins

When Goodie wins
  • Platform coverage matters. Goodie monitors 11 AI platforms; Screaming Frog covers 0.
  • Broadest AI engine coverage in the category (11 platforms including niche engines like Amazon Rufus, DeepSeek, Grok, and Meta AI)
When Screaming Frog wins
  • Budget is the constraint. Screaming Frog starts at $0/mo vs Goodie's $∞/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
  • Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
  • You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
  • You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Goodie plus an agency.
  • You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
  • You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.

Reasons to pick one over the other

Reasons to pick Goodie over Screaming Frog

  1. Broader AI platform coverage. Goodie tracks visibility across 11 AI engines vs Screaming Frog's 0.
  2. Built for the LLM era. Goodie was founded in 2022, built around AI search from day one; Screaming Frog dates back to 2010 and is retrofitting.
  3. What users praise most. Broadest AI engine coverage in the category (11 platforms including niche engines like Amazon Rufus, DeepSeek, Grok, and Meta AI)

Reasons to pick Screaming Frog over Goodie

  1. Lower entry price. Screaming Frog publishes a clear entry tier at $0/mo; Goodie gates pricing.
  2. More plan flexibility. Screaming Frog offers 4 pricing tiers vs Goodie's 3, so there's a better chance one fits your team size.
  3. More verified reviews. Screaming Frog has 186 G2 reviews vs Goodie's none on file, so the average rating carries more weight.
  4. Faster product velocity. Screaming Frog has shipped 4 public launches in the last year vs Goodie's 1.
  5. More mature platform. Screaming Frog (founded 2010) has had more time to harden the product than Goodie (2022).
  6. Wider integration ecosystem. Screaming Frog integrates with 10 tools; Goodie ships 6.
  7. What users praise most. Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.
  8. EU data residency. Screaming Frog is HQ'd in Henley-in-Arden, UK, which simplifies GDPR data-processor agreements for European buyers.

Switching from one to the other

From Goodie to Screaming Frog

Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Goodie (most tools support CSV export). Most Screaming Frog setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate Screaming Frog's data againstGoodie's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Goodie. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.

From Screaming Frog to Goodie

Same flow in reverse. Export from Screaming Frog, import to Goodie. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.

From either to GrowthManager.ai

We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.

Side by side, every number we could verify

GoodieScreaming Frog
Starts at (USD/mo)Custom (quote-based)$0/mo
Founded20222010
HeadquartersNew York City, United StatesHenley-in-Arden, UK
Funding raisedBootstrapped
AI platforms tracked11
G2 rating4.7 / 5 (186 reviews)
Named customers
SOC 2 Type 2
GDPR✓ Yes
HIPAA

What real users say

Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.

Goodiewhat users praise

  • Broadest AI engine coverage in the category (11 platforms including niche engines like Amazon Rufus, DeepSeek, Grok, and Meta AI)
  • Actionable optimization layer that closes the loop between insights and execution inside a single platform
  • Delivers measurable, defensible business outcomes — documented client results across conversions, citations, and traffic
  • User-friendly dashboard with digestible metrics accessible to both technical and non-technical marketers
  • Multi-market, multilingual monitoring with region and language segmentation — a differentiator for global enterprise brands

Goodiewhat users complain about

  • No free trial — only demos and a free AI Search Assessment, putting it at a disadvantage vs. competitors that allow self-serve evaluation
  • Premium pricing with no published rates makes ROI justification difficult for smaller or budget-constrained teams
  • Onboarding complexity and setup friction — not self-serve; requires hands-on support and operational discipline to get started
  • Rapid product roadmap velocity creates a 'moving target' effect — users must stay constantly informed of changes
  • Not a replacement for traditional SEO tools — lacks site audits, keyword explorers, backlink crawlers, and web search monitoring

Screaming Frogwhat users praise

  • Free version actually works for sites under 500 URLs, which reviewers say is rare in SEO tooling.
  • Comprehensive technical audit catches broken links, redirect chains, duplicate content, missing canonicals, and metadata errors in one pass.
  • Custom extraction with XPath and CSS selectors is repeatedly cited as the killer feature for scraping data no other crawler can pull.
  • Recent integrations with OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini let users run prompts against scraped content during a crawl.
  • One-time low annual fee ($21/mo equivalent) is dramatically cheaper than Semrush or Ahrefs site audits.

Screaming Frogwhat users complain about

  • Desktop-only Java app, so reviewers complain there is no cloud dashboard and no way to share live crawl data with teammates.
  • Heavy memory footprint, with users reporting that large sites (1M+ URLs) require 32GB RAM and database storage mode.
  • UI looks dated and the learning curve is steep for non-technical users, especially around XPath extraction.
  • No keyword research, backlink analysis, or rank tracking, so users still need a second tool for those workflows.
  • No collaboration features, so two SEOs cannot work on the same crawl results without exporting CSVs.

A third option

Both Goodie and Screaming Frogare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Goodie or Screaming Frog?

Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Goodie and Screaming Frog are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Goodie for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.

How much do Goodie and Screaming Frog cost?

Goodie starts at Custom (quote-based). Screaming Frog starts at $0/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.

Which AI platforms do Goodie and Screaming Frog cover?

Goodie covers 11 AI platforms. Screaming Frog covers an undisclosed number of. Most tools in this space monitor ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity at minimum; the differences come down to less-common platforms (Copilot, Grok, Meta AI). GrowthManager.ai monitors the same four primary platforms and acts on the data.

Do Goodie and Screaming Frog actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?

Both Goodie and Screaming Frog are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.

What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Goodie and Screaming Frog?

GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.

Further reading

External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.

  1. Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft

    How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.

  2. Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig

    Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.

  3. Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner

    Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.

  4. Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro

    Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.

  5. Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman

    The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.

Disclosure + methodology

GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.