Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026

Genrank vs Seobility: which one wins in 2026?

An honest editorial comparison from the team at GrowthManager.ai. We make a competing product, which is disclosed in full at the bottom.

Genrank and Seobility both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Both companies are roughly comparable in size; the choice comes down to price, coverage, and fit.

The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.

The verdict
Pick

Genrank

Pick Genrank if you need broader AI platform coverage (1 platforms vs 0); and you trust traction signals — they list 4 customers, Seobility lists 0.

Pick

Seobility

Seobility is the right pick if your team prefers their approach and pricing fits.

If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.

The case for Genrank

Founded by Maziar Foroudian. On their site they list 4 named customers including Recrawled, Orange Line, Krachtig Online, Caever Advocaten. They cover 1 AI platforms. Pricing starts at $0/mo.

ChatGPT-first brand monitoring and rank tracking tool that identifies when and how brands are mentioned in AI-generated responses.

What people praise

  • Intuitive setup, uses AI itself to generate the initial prompt set so onboarding is fast
  • Conversation Explorer surfaces how real users phrase queries to ChatGPT, a feature reviewers call worth the price on its own
  • Daily refresh on all paid plans keeps visibility data current
  • Free tier gives a real working dashboard, not a watered-down demo

Where it falls short

  • Focused primarily on ChatGPT as the original ChatGPT rank tracker, less coverage of Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity than Gauge or Evertune
  • Region-dependent pricing creates confusion when comparing plans across markets
  • Prompt slot caps (10/25/150) require careful planning so important queries aren't excluded
  • Smaller third-party review footprint outside G2, limited Reddit or Trustpilot signal

The case for Seobility

Seobility has raised Bootstrapped. Pricing starts at $0/mo.

All-in-one SEO software for site audits, rank tracking, and backlink analysis.

What people praise

  • Free Basic tier is unusually capable, with reviewers saying it beats paid tiers of some competitors for solo site owners.
  • TF*IDF content optimization is repeatedly highlighted as the single most useful on-page tool at the price.
  • German-built with strong GDPR compliance and EU data residency, attractive to European customers.
  • Premium plan at ~$54/mo is dramatically cheaper than Semrush or Ahrefs for similar core SEO workflows.

Where it falls short

  • Keyword database is smaller and US-coverage weaker than Semrush, especially for niche queries.
  • Backlink index is shallower and refresh cadence slower than Ahrefs or Majestic.
  • Integration surface is limited: no Looker Studio connector, no Slack notifications, no Zapier triggers.
  • Limited competitor analysis depth makes it weaker for serious agencies tracking many client niches.

Pricing, tier by tier

Tier 1
Genrank
Free
$0/mo
  • Brand visibility tracking
  • 10 prompt slots
  • 1 project
  • Daily refresh
Seobility
Basic
$0
  • 1 website project
  • 1,000 pages per crawl
  • 10 ranking keywords
  • 5 tool requests per day
Tier 2
Genrank
Essential
$59-95/mo
  • Brand visibility
  • Competitor insights
  • Citation sources
  • Brand perception
Seobility
Premium
$54/mo
  • 3 website projects
  • 25,000 pages per crawl
  • 300 ranking keywords
  • 50 tool requests per day
Tier 3
Genrank
Pro
$169-239/mo
  • Content optimization
  • Entity clarity
  • 150 prompt slots
  • 3 projects
Seobility
Agency
$195/mo
  • 15 website projects
  • 100,000 pages per crawl
  • 1,500 ranking keywords
  • 200 tool requests per day
Tier 4
Genrank
Scale
Custom
  • API access
  • Priority support
  • Custom prompt slots
  • Custom projects and competitors
Seobility
—
—

Feature parity

What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.

Only on Genrank
  • Prompt Research. Identifies customer prompts via search queries, page scanning, and prompt management
  • Response Tracking. Monitors brand visibility, competitor positioning, brand perception, and citation sources in AI answers
  • Content Optimization. Recommends content edits to improve how the brand is retrieved and cited
  • Entity Clarity. Diagnoses how clearly AI models understand the brand entity and what to clean up
  • Conversation Explorer. Shows real ChatGPT conversation patterns so teams can spot how customers phrase questions
  • Sentiment Tracking. Tracks tone of how AI models describe the brand over time
Only on Seobility
  • On-Page SEO Audit. Crawls site pages and surfaces prioritized on-page issues with explanations and fix suggestions.
  • TF*IDF Tool. Compares the term frequency of your content against top-ranking pages to recommend missing topics.
  • Keyword Research. Suggestions, related keywords, and ranking checker across major search engines.
  • Backlink Analysis. Tracks gained and lost backlinks with referring-domain and anchor-text breakdowns.
  • Rank Tracking. Daily updates for tracked keywords with historic graphs and competitor comparison.
  • White-Label PDF Reports. Agency-friendly client reports with custom branding and scheduling.

When each one wins

When Genrank wins
  • Platform coverage matters. Genrank monitors 1 AI platforms; Seobility covers 0.
  • You're enterprise and need to call a reference. Genrank lists 4 named customers; Seobility lists 0.
  • Intuitive setup, uses AI itself to generate the initial prompt set so onboarding is fast
When Seobility wins
  • Free Basic tier is unusually capable, with reviewers saying it beats paid tiers of some competitors for solo site owners.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
  • You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
  • You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Genrank plus an agency.
  • You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
  • You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.

Reasons to pick one over the other

Reasons to pick Genrank over Seobility

  1. More plan flexibility. Genrank offers 4 pricing tiers vs Seobility's 3, so there's a better chance one fits your team size.
  2. Broader AI platform coverage. Genrank tracks visibility across 1 AI engines vs Seobility's 0.
  3. More named customers. Genrank lists 4 customers vs Seobility's 0, including Recrawled, Orange Line, Krachtig Online.
  4. Built for the LLM era. Genrank was founded in 2024, built around AI search from day one; Seobility dates back to 2014 and is retrofitting.
  5. What users praise most. Intuitive setup, uses AI itself to generate the initial prompt set so onboarding is fast

Reasons to pick Seobility over Genrank

  1. More verified reviews. Seobility has 401 G2 reviews vs Genrank's 6, so the average rating carries more weight.
  2. More mature platform. Seobility (founded 2014) has had more time to harden the product than Genrank (2024).
  3. What users praise most. Free Basic tier is unusually capable, with reviewers saying it beats paid tiers of some competitors for solo site owners.

Switching from one to the other

From Genrank to Seobility

Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Genrank (most tools support CSV export). Most Seobility setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate Seobility's data againstGenrank's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Genrank. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.

From Seobility to Genrank

Same flow in reverse. Export from Seobility, import to Genrank. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.

From either to GrowthManager.ai

We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.

Side by side, every number we could verify

GenrankSeobility
Starts at (USD/mo)$0/mo$0/mo
Founded20242014
Headquarters—Erlangen, Germany
Funding raised—Bootstrapped
AI platforms tracked1—
G2 rating—4.6 / 5 (401 reviews)
Named customers4—
SOC 2 Type 2——
GDPR—✓ Yes
HIPAA——

What real users say

Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.

Genrank — what users praise

  • Intuitive setup, uses AI itself to generate the initial prompt set so onboarding is fast
  • Conversation Explorer surfaces how real users phrase queries to ChatGPT, a feature reviewers call worth the price on its own
  • Daily refresh on all paid plans keeps visibility data current
  • Free tier gives a real working dashboard, not a watered-down demo
  • Earned a spot on G2's Grid for AEO since the Winter 2026 Reports launch

Genrank — what users complain about

  • Focused primarily on ChatGPT as the original ChatGPT rank tracker, less coverage of Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity than Gauge or Evertune
  • Region-dependent pricing creates confusion when comparing plans across markets
  • Prompt slot caps (10/25/150) require careful planning so important queries aren't excluded
  • Smaller third-party review footprint outside G2, limited Reddit or Trustpilot signal
  • API access locked to the custom-priced Scale tier, limiting programmatic use for smaller teams

Seobility — what users praise

  • Free Basic tier is unusually capable, with reviewers saying it beats paid tiers of some competitors for solo site owners.
  • TF*IDF content optimization is repeatedly highlighted as the single most useful on-page tool at the price.
  • German-built with strong GDPR compliance and EU data residency, attractive to European customers.
  • Premium plan at ~$54/mo is dramatically cheaper than Semrush or Ahrefs for similar core SEO workflows.
  • On-page audit gives granular, actionable recommendations rather than vague scores per G2 reviewers.

Seobility — what users complain about

  • Keyword database is smaller and US-coverage weaker than Semrush, especially for niche queries.
  • Backlink index is shallower and refresh cadence slower than Ahrefs or Majestic.
  • Integration surface is limited: no Looker Studio connector, no Slack notifications, no Zapier triggers.
  • Limited competitor analysis depth makes it weaker for serious agencies tracking many client niches.
  • Tool requests are capped daily even on paid plans, which power users find restrictive.

A third option

Both Genrank and Seobilityare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.

Book a free 20-min auditSee the full 7-tool comparison

Other comparisons in this space

Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Genrank or Seobility?

Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Genrank and Seobility are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Genrank for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.

How much do Genrank and Seobility cost?

Genrank starts at $0/mo. Seobility starts at $0/mo. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.

Which AI platforms do Genrank and Seobility cover?

Genrank covers 1 AI platforms. Seobility covers an undisclosed number of. Most tools in this space monitor ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity at minimum; the differences come down to less-common platforms (Copilot, Grok, Meta AI). GrowthManager.ai monitors the same four primary platforms and acts on the data.

Do Genrank and Seobility actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?

Both Genrank and Seobility are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.

What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Genrank and Seobility?

GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.

Further reading

External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.

  1. Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft

    How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.

  2. Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig

    Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.

  3. Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner

    Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.

  4. Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro

    Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.

  5. Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman

    The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.

Disclosure + methodology

GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.