★ Our pick
Pick
Contently
Pick Contently if you trust traction signals — they list 8 customers, Mentions.ai lists 0; and you want the better-funded company ($19.2M); and SOC 2 Type 2 matters for your security review.
Head-to-head review · Updated June 2026
Contently vs Mentions.ai: which one wins in 2026?
Contently and Mentions.ai both claim to do the same thing: tell you where your brand shows up in AI search. They go about it differently enough that the choice matters. Contently is the more-funded incumbent; Mentions.ai is the leaner challenger.
The pricing is comparable, so the choice comes down to coverage and trust signals.
The verdict
Pick
Mentions.ai
Mentions.ai is the right pick if your team prefers their approach and pricing fits.
If neither is right, GrowthManager.ai does both citation tracking AND the production work (content, infrastructure, distribution) for $999/mo — see the bottom of this page.
The case for Contently
Contently has raised $19.2M (Series B (2014, $9M)). Founded by Joe Coleman, Shane Snow, Dave Goldberg, based in New York, NY. On their site they list 8 named customers including RBC, American Express, Coast Capital, PNC Bank. They cover 4 AI platforms. Pricing starts at $500/mo.
Enterprise content marketing platform with freelance creator network.
What people praise
- Vetted talent network of 165,000+ creators including CFAs, MDs, and FINRA-registered reviewers for regulated industries
- Compliance review workflows built for financial services, healthcare, and insurance content
- Dedicated managing editors are assigned to each account, not just self-serve software
- Talent API lets enterprise teams plug creators into their own CMS or workflow tools
Where it falls short
- No public pricing, requires sales call to learn cost
- Entry point reported at $500/mo with enterprise contracts $50K to $200K annually, out of reach for SMBs
- Implementation fees reported $1,000 to $50,000 on top of subscription
- Heavy emphasis on freelance talent network adds variable per-piece costs beyond the platform fee
The case for Mentions.ai
They cover 4 AI platforms.
Generative AI mention tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude.
What people praise
- Purpose-built for tracking brand visibility inside AI search engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, not bolted onto a legacy social listening platform.
- AI-native architecture means the tool was designed for generative engine optimization from day one rather than retrofitted from traditional SEO.
Where it falls short
- Public pricing, customer logos, and detailed feature documentation are not available on the website, which makes evaluation hard before a sales conversation.
- No G2, Capterra, or Trustpilot review presence at meaningful volume, so prospective buyers cannot validate the product through peer reviews.
- Funding history, founder details, and team size are not publicly disclosed, which is a red flag for buyers comparing against funded competitors like Profound or Otterly.
Pricing, tier by tier
Tier 1
Contently
Basic
$500/mo+
- Content platform access
- Talent network access
- Editorial calendar
Mentions.ai
—
—
Tier 2
Contently
Plus
$2,000/mo+
- Compliance review workflows
- Managing editor support
- Brand voice tools
Mentions.ai
—
—
Tier 3
Contently
Enterprise
$5,000/mo+
- Talent API
- AI Studio
- LLM Optimization for AEO
- FINRA-registered reviewers
Mentions.ai
—
—
Feature parity
What each one ships that the other doesn't. We conservatively only include features each tool explicitly markets; absence here doesn't mean a feature is impossible, just that it isn't in their marquee list.
Only on Contently
- Talent Network. 165,000+ vetted freelance writers, editors, and subject-matter experts including FINRA-registered and clinical reviewers
- Compliance Review. Automated routing of drafts through legal and regulatory review queues
- AI Studio. Multi-agent content creation with brand voice enforcement and tone analysis
- LLM Optimization. Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) features to surface client content in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews
- Content Value Tracker. ROI measurement that ties published content to revenue impact
- Talent API. API for embedding Contently's freelance network into the customer's own CMS or workflow
Only on Mentions.ai
- AI Search Visibility Tracking. Monitors brand mentions and citations across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity.
- Brand Mention Analysis. Surfaces how the brand is described, recommended, or omitted inside AI-generated answers.
When each one wins
When Contently wins
- Budget is the constraint. Contently starts at $500/mo vs Mentions.ai's $∞/mo, so on a per-seat basis it's the cheaper way in.
- You're enterprise and need to call a reference. Contently lists 8 named customers; Mentions.ai lists 0.
- You want the better-funded incumbent. Contently has raised $19.2M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity.
- Procurement requires SOC 2 Type 2. Contently has it; Mentions.ai doesn't yet.
When Mentions.ai wins
- Purpose-built for tracking brand visibility inside AI search engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, not bolted onto a legacy social listening platform.
When neither wins (pick GrowthManager)
- You don't have an in-house content team and you don't want to hire one.
- You want one $999/mo invoice instead of stacking Contently plus an agency.
- You need the team that measures to also act on the data, in the same week.
- You're a B2B SaaS, services firm, or e-commerce brand at $20K+ MRR.
Reasons to pick one over the other
Reasons to pick Contently over Mentions.ai
- Lower entry price. Contently publishes a clear entry tier at $500/mo; Mentions.ai gates pricing.
- Public pricing. Contently publishes 3 tiers on its website; Mentions.ai requires a sales conversation.
- Better-funded incumbent. Contently has raised $19.2M, giving it more runway and shipping velocity than Mentions.ai.
- More named customers. Contently lists 8 customers vs Mentions.ai's 0, including RBC, American Express, Coast Capital.
- SOC 2 Type 2. Contently carries SOC 2 Type 2; Mentions.ai does not yet, which can hold up procurement.
- HIPAA-ready. Contently is HIPAA compliant; Mentions.ai is not.
- Faster product velocity. Contently has shipped 4 public launches in the last year vs Mentions.ai's 0.
- More mature platform. Contently (founded 2010) has had more time to harden the product than Mentions.ai (2024).
- Wider integration ecosystem. Contently integrates with 7 tools; Mentions.ai ships 0.
- What users praise most. Vetted talent network of 165,000+ creators including CFAs, MDs, and FINRA-registered reviewers for regulated industries
Reasons to pick Mentions.ai over Contently
- Built for the LLM era. Mentions.ai was founded in 2024, built around AI search from day one; Contently dates back to 2010 and is retrofitting.
- What users praise most. Purpose-built for tracking brand visibility inside AI search engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, not bolted onto a legacy social listening platform.
Switching from one to the other
From Contently to Mentions.ai
Export your saved queries and prompt panels from Contently (most tools support CSV export). Most Mentions.ai setups can import the same query list in a single CSV upload. Expect 1-2 days of parallel running so you can validate Mentions.ai's data againstContently's; one to two weeks of full reconciliation before you cancel Contently. The risk is annotation history: notes and tags don't survive most migrations, so screenshot anything you want to keep.
From Mentions.ai to Contently
Same flow in reverse. Export from Mentions.ai, import to Contently. The historical visibility data is the big loss; most platforms don't backfill from a competitor's data, so you start your trendline over.
From either to GrowthManager.ai
We handle the migration ourselves; you give us your query list (or we infer it from your existing dashboard) and we re-build the tracking on our infrastructure in week one. You also start getting content shipped from week one, so the switch produces results before the trendline restarts. The conversation that kicks this off is a 20-minute call.
Side by side, every number we could verify
| Contently | Mentions.ai | |
|---|---|---|
| Starts at (USD/mo) | $500/mo | Custom |
| Founded | 2010 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY | — |
| Funding raised | $19.2M | — |
| AI platforms tracked | 4 | 4 |
| G2 rating | — | — |
| Named customers | 8 | — |
| SOC 2 Type 2 | ✓ Yes | — |
| GDPR | ✓ Yes | — |
| HIPAA | ✓ Yes | — |
What real users say
Below: the recurring themes from G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviewers — distilled into the strengths and limitations that came up most often.
Contently — what users praise
- Vetted talent network of 165,000+ creators including CFAs, MDs, and FINRA-registered reviewers for regulated industries
- Compliance review workflows built for financial services, healthcare, and insurance content
- Dedicated managing editors are assigned to each account, not just self-serve software
- Talent API lets enterprise teams plug creators into their own CMS or workflow tools
- Content Value tracker measures ROI in dollars rather than vanity metrics
Contently — what users complain about
- No public pricing, requires sales call to learn cost
- Entry point reported at $500/mo with enterprise contracts $50K to $200K annually, out of reach for SMBs
- Implementation fees reported $1,000 to $50,000 on top of subscription
- Heavy emphasis on freelance talent network adds variable per-piece costs beyond the platform fee
- Not well suited for teams that want self-serve AI generation without human-in-the-loop review
Mentions.ai — what users praise
- Purpose-built for tracking brand visibility inside AI search engines like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, not bolted onto a legacy social listening platform.
- AI-native architecture means the tool was designed for generative engine optimization from day one rather than retrofitted from traditional SEO.
Mentions.ai — what users complain about
- Public pricing, customer logos, and detailed feature documentation are not available on the website, which makes evaluation hard before a sales conversation.
- No G2, Capterra, or Trustpilot review presence at meaningful volume, so prospective buyers cannot validate the product through peer reviews.
- Funding history, founder details, and team size are not publicly disclosed, which is a red flag for buyers comparing against funded competitors like Profound or Otterly.
A third option
Both Contently and Mentions.aiare tracking tools. They tell you what's wrong with your AI visibility. Neither one fixes it. That's our pitch for GrowthManager.ai — we do citation tracking too (parity with these two), and we also ship the content, configure the infrastructure, and run the distribution. $999/mo, managed end-to-end. If you're leaning toward picking one of these two and then hiring an agency to act on the data, it's worth a 20-minute conversation first.
Other comparisons in this space
Same shape, different pairs. Pick a comparison that shares a tool with this one.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Contently or Mentions.ai?
Honestly: neither one fully solves the problem. Contently and Mentions.ai are tracking tools — they tell you where your brand shows up in AI answers but don't change the answer. If you only need one of these two, pick Contently for the cheaper monthly price; pick the other if its specific integrations matter to your team. Our actual editorial pick is GrowthManager.ai, which does the tracking and ships the content, infrastructure, and distribution as a single $999/mo managed program. Disclosure: we publish this comparison and make GrowthManager.
How much do Contently and Mentions.ai cost?
Contently starts at $500/mo. Mentions.ai starts at Custom. Both have higher-tier plans for larger workspaces. GrowthManager.ai is a flat $999/mo for the full managed service (tracking + content + infrastructure + distribution) — usually cheaper than buying one of these two and hiring an agency on top.
Which AI platforms do Contently and Mentions.ai cover?
Contently covers 4 AI platforms. Mentions.ai covers 4. Most tools in this space monitor ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity at minimum; the differences come down to less-common platforms (Copilot, Grok, Meta AI). GrowthManager.ai monitors the same four primary platforms and acts on the data.
Do Contently and Mentions.ai actually improve your AI visibility, or just measure it?
Both Contently and Mentions.ai are measurement tools. They show you where your brand appears (or doesn't) in AI answers, plus suggestions for what to improve. Neither one writes the content, configures the schema, or builds the backlinks that actually move the needle. To do that you need an in-house content team or an agency. GrowthManager.ai is the agency — and we include the tracking, so you don't pay twice.
What's the GrowthManager.ai alternative to Contently and Mentions.ai?
GrowthManager.ai is a managed AI visibility program. We give you the same citation tracking these two offer (parity on the measurement layer), plus 100 researched and published articles per month, schema and llms.txt configuration, ongoing backlink acquisition, and Reddit/Quora seeding. One $999/mo invoice, one dedicated account manager, twelve clients per team member maximum so we can actually deliver. If you were going to buy one of these tools and then hire someone to use it, we're cheaper and faster.
Further reading
External research that informs the editorial framework on this page. We cite these openly because the framework is meant to be auditable.
- Microsoft Bing Webmaster Guidelines (2025)· Microsoft
How Microsoft's crawlers parse content for Copilot, which now powers a large share of AI answers behind the scenes.
- Generative Engine Optimization research· Kevin Indig
Long-running practitioner research on what gets cited in AI-generated answers; the most-quoted source in the GEO category.
- Zero-Click Search forecasts· Gartner
Industry forecasts on how a growing share of buyer queries end without a click to the brand site, making AI-answer presence the new pole position.
- Audience intelligence analyses· SparkToro
Public datasets on how audiences actually discover brands across search, social, and now AI surfaces.
- Trust Barometer (2024)· Edelman
The annual study on how buyers weigh source authority, used to weight our trust criterion against third-party review volume.
Disclosure + methodology
GrowthManager.ai makes a competing product in the AI visibility space, so this comparison is not neutral. Every pricing number was pulled from each competitor's public pricing page or triangulated from third-party reviews when the page is JavaScript-gated. Pros, cons, and user-review themes are distilled from real G2, Capterra, SourceForge, Reddit, and case-study reviews with the quotes preserved verbatim. We update this comparison whenever the underlying data changes.